Dust settles on the money fight

Something for almost everyone in legislative funding decisions

When Colorado lawmakers boast about what they did for education funding in the 2014 session, they aren’t just blowing political hot air.

The 2014-15 school finance package, plus spending included in other bills, comes to just over $479 million for K-12 education. (Throw in the $100 million in higher education funding growth and you’re talking about real money.)

And the big fight over whether to add money to basic school funding or funnel it to special programs ended with about 73 percent of the cash going to district operations.

That debate was unusually tense at times during the legislature’s five-month run, but Gov. John Hickenlooper, key lawmakers, superintendents and lobbyists were all smiles at a recent signing ceremony for two key finance bills (see story).

“We did unprecedented work in funding education,” Senate Majority Leader Rollie Heath, D-Boulder, told reporters during an end-of-session briefing.

But the good feelings may not last for long.

Even though legislative action trimmed the $1 billion-plus K-12 budget shortfall, that gap still stands at $894.3 million. Created by a legislative budget-cutting device called the “negative factor,” the shortfall is the difference between what schools actually receive for basic operating costs (known as Total Program Funding) and what they would have been allocated without the negative factor.

Because of that remaining shortfall, education interest groups will continue to press for further reductions in the negative factor. “We have much ground to make up in school funding,” said Kerrie Dallman, president of the Colorado Education Association, after the session adjourned. “We made some good progress this year, but we are nowhere close to making a proper investment in our public schools,”

“The negative factor will continue to be an issue. It’s going to take a number of years to repay,” said Jane Urschel, deputy executive director of the Colorado Association of School Boards.

Gov. John Hickenlooper signs K-12 funding bills with students.
PHOTO: Kayleigh Skinner
Gov. John Hickenlooper signs K-12 funding bills with students.

Political leaders are crossing their figures that the fight won’t be as rough in 2015. “I hope next year won’t be as contentious,” said Dillon Democratic Rep. Millie Hamner, chair of the House Education Committee and a key player to the Student Success Act and the School Finance Act.

“I think it will be a continuing discussion,” said Hickenlooper. “I don’t think it will be a battle every year.”

Whether those hopes are realized remains to be seen, given that a variety of fiscal constraints and demands on the legislature could make it harder to trim the negative factor in the future. One of those is the fact that 2014-15 Total Program Funding increase become part of the K-12 budget base, which has to increase by enrollment and inflation every year.

“It’s going to be a harder fight for a smaller increase every year,” predicts Senate President Morgan Carroll, D-Aurora. “We’re going to hit a natural ceiling.”

Denver Democratic Sen. Mike Johnston agreed, saying, “We’re a year or two away from hitting the structural wall” that will make it tough to trim the negative factor.

Outgoing House Speaker Mark Ferrandino, D-Denver, originally resisted cuts in the negative factor but was on board with the final deal. “I think we ended up in a good place,” he said. “I feel comfortable. I’m very comfortable that we are sustainable over the next two years.”

Inside the big ed spending bills

K12_201415_SpendingChart

In their push to reduce the negative factor, district lobbyists worked hard to defeat bills that earmarked spending on specific education programs. They weren’t totally successful, but Urschel said, “I think we did very well on ‘no new mandates.’”

In contrast to many of the prior six sessions, the 2014 legislature didn’t create any big, brand-new education programs. Much of the targeted funding that was approved this year will go to existing programs that lawmakers and interest groups felt needed more money.

Here’s rundown of that spending, organized thematically with information about who gets the money or who benefits. You can get more detailed information about the bills that authorized the spending in this special Spending Bill Tracker.

Total Program Funding

Basic school support will be $5.93 billion next year, up from $5.52 billion in 2013-14. (The state share is rising $365.2 million, while local district revenues will go up about $40 million.) Next year’s funding will average $7,020, up from $6,652, according to the Department of Education.

Use Chalkbeat Colorado’s interactive database to see your district’s 2014-15 funding, and how much it will change from this year.

Special groups of students

The biggest chunk of targeted additional spending, about $63.5 million, goes to three groups of special students — at-risk preschool and kindergarten students, English language learners and primary-grade students who are behind in reading.

Funding for these programs generally is given to districts on a per-pupil basis for students who meet the criteria for various programs.

Preschool & kindergarten – $17 million in additional funding was allocated to what’s called the Early Childhood At-risk Enhancement program. That allows school districts to use the funding for either preschool or kindergarten slots for children who meet the at-risk definition of the Colorado Preschool Program. The new money adds 5,000 slots, which will mean an estimated 28,360 students will be served. (House Bill 14-1298 – School Finance Act)

English language learners – The legislature updated state law on services for such students and added $27 million in per-pupil funding. A key change in the law makes students eligible for extra funding for up to five years instead of the two years that has been the limit. ELL programs this year received $15.2 million in “categorical funding,” a $268.8 million pot of targeting spending that’s required by Amendment 23. ELL categorical funding rises to $16.7 million next year, in addition to the $27 million. Under one of the many school funding compromises made this session, the $27 million was not added to categorical funding because doing so would have locked that money into the base and given future legislatures no ability to cut the money in bad budget years. (HB 14-1298)

Struggling readers – Districts will receive an additional $18 million, again distributed per the numbers of eligible students, for early literacy interventions mandated by the 2012 READ Act, which requires individual plans and attention for lagging readers in grades K-3. The law was one of the few reform measures in recent years that was reasonably well funded from the start. But the number of students needing help was larger than expected, so the $18 million is in addition to the $15.4 million previously budgeted. (House Bill 14-1292 – Student Success Act)

Who lost out

Both Republican and Democratic lawmakers pushed to increase funding for full-day kindergarten for all students, but those efforts ultimately stalled. (For kindergarten students, the state currently pays districts 58 percent of funding for other students. If districts want to offer full-day kindergarten they have to pay for it themselves – or charge parents. Kindergarten attendance is not compulsory in Colorado.)

There was debate this session about devoting additional funding to at-risk students in general. Some districts argued that extra money for at-risk preschoolers and for English-language learners doesn’t help districts with poor students who don’t fall into those categories. But no one found an affordable compromise on the issue.

Additional funding for special education students really wasn’t on the table this session. Budget increases for such programs was approved in recent sessions.

Other student support

A few bills targeting smaller groups of students managed to survive the 2014 session.

Gifted & talented – A proposal to require screening of all students and hiring of qualified coordinators in all districts was whittled down to $1.9 million and stripped of most of its mandates. The funding is on top of $9.6 million in existing money. (House Bill 14-1102)

Advanced Placement classes – This legislation was relentlessly whittled down as it moved through the process and ended up with $261,561 to provide incentives for rural districts to provide AP classes. The grants are capped at 475 students. (House Bill 14-1118)

Counselors – The Colorado Counselor Corps, which provides additional counselors at schools with at-risk students, got an additional $3 million on top of $5 million in current funding. This bill was one of several that took a haircut. (Senate Bill 14-150)

And still more spending bills

A long list of other measures, and provisions in omnibus spending bills, provided cash for a wide variety of administrative costs, studies, training, school safety and other programs.

At-risk student support

Minority teachers – Lawmakers found $50,000 for the Department of Education to do a study of recruitment and retention of minority teachers. (House Bill 14-1175)

Opportunity gaps – This is a mandate that would provide $144,216 to create a database to track enrollment of different groups of students in core courses, also correlated to test scores. The idea is to uncover tracking of minority students. (House Bill 14-1376)

Turnaround leaders – A program to train leaders for low-performing schools received $2 million in funding. (Senate Bill 14-214)

Charter school facilities

Charter schools, which usually don’t have access to bond issue and other revenues that districts enjoy, often struggle with construction, lease and maintenance costs. Charters will get up to $11.5 million in per-pupil based facilities reimbursements, on top of the current $7 million. Another $6.5 million was added to a fund that backs charter construction loans. (HB 14-1292)

Health & Safety

School meals – Students in grades 3-5 who are eligible for reduced-price meals will get free meals under a bill that primarily will tap federal funds. (House Bill 14-1156). The Breakfast After the Bell program will get an additional $14.3 million in federal funds. (House Bill 14-1336 – Main state budget)

Medical emergencies – High school students will be able to get training in CPR under a $250,000 new grant program. (House Bill 14-1276)

Walking to school – The Safe Routes to School program, which provides education about safe walking and biking to school, will get $700,000 in state funds, partly to cover loss of federal money that the Department of Education has received in the past. (House Bill 14-1301)

Threat reporting – The non-profit Safe2Tell program is being brought into the Department of Law and funded with $318,246 in state money. The program provides a way for young people to anonymously report threats (including suicide), bullying and other dangers. (Senate Bill 14-002)

Marijuana – A bill that details how the state will use marijuana tax revenues includes $2.5 million for a grant program that schools can tap for school nurse training and marijuana education. (Senate Bill 14-215)

Testing

The legislature stepped away from making any changes to the state testing system but did come up with $142,750 to fund work related to a task force study of assessments. (House Bill 14-1202) There’s also $3.8 million in additional funds earmarked for CDE testing costs, and $826,046 more for Spanish language tests. (HB 14-1336)

Administrative Costs & Another Study

What’s included

  • While much of the 2014 debate swirled around use of the state General Fund and the State Education Fund, this story lists bills that tapped other sources of revenue, including federal funds, to give a broader of education funding increases. (Spending for the Building Excellent Schools Today construction program, which receives revenues from state-owned lands, isn’t included.)

Financial transparency – The final big fight over the Student Success Act was about whether to fund a state website that users could search for information about K-12 spending, down to the individual school level. CDE received $3 million to hire a contractor to build such a site, which doesn’t have to launch before July 1, 2017. (HB 14-1292)

Online schools – Among the many studies is one on how to oversee multi-district online schools. A task force will be created to do that, at a cost of $47,659. (House Bill 14-1382)

Small districts – Colorado’s boards of cooperative educational services will get an additional $2 million in state funding, the idea being to give BOCES more resources so that they can help smaller districts with implementation of various new state educational requirements. (HB 14-1298)

CDE increases – The department got several pots of additional money to run various programs, including teacher of the year ($24,800), early childhood administration ($63,607), creation of early childhood student identifiers ($298,000), information technology improvements ($3 million), English language learner programs ($311,682) and college and career readiness programs ($170,845). (HB 14-1298 and HB 14-1336)

CDE also gets a little bit off the top of several bills for administration. For example, state law allows the department to retain up to 3 percent of Counselor Corps funding for its costs – primarily staff – of running the program.

Compromise

Indiana budget deal would offer modest school funding increases plus a big fix for teacher bonuses

PHOTO: Alan Petersime

Many schools across Indiana could expect more money per student in the coming years and strong teachers at struggling schools would be likely to receive higher bonuses under a budget deal announced Friday.

House and Senate lawmakers have come to an agreement on how much money to send to Indiana schools over the next two years. The budget would increase total dollars for schools by about 3.3 percent from 2017 to 2019. Included within that: a 2.5 percent average increase for per-student funding to $6,709 in 2019, up from $6,540 this year. The budget is expected to go up for a final vote late Friday.

Overall, the budget plan would accomplish some of the key goals prioritized by Gov. Eric Holcomb, state Superintendent Jennifer McCormick and House Republicans. Those goals include increasing funding for the state’s preschool program, internet access for schools, and Advanced Placement exams that help students earn college credit while in high school.

Under the compromise, every district in Marion County would see its basic state aid and per-student funding increase, including Indianapolis Public Schools. (IPS would have seen cuts in the House plan, and the increases wound have been higher under the Senate plan.)

Suburban districts such as Carmel and Hamilton Southeastern would get sizable funding bumps as with the Senate plan. Districts losing enrollment, including East Chicago, could lose state money. But overall, many of the districts with some of the state’s poorest students stand to see increases. The Gary and Hammond districts, for example, would both see gains in per-student funding and overall.

Lawmakers also settled on a compromise about how to pay teachers.

Throughout the session, they waffled about whether to pay teachers more for their performance or for taking on additional work in their schools.

At first, the House cut the bonuses entirely and set aside $3 million for a “career pathways” program that would reward teachers who take on leadership roles in their schools. That was far less money than the $40 million the Senate wanted to put toward teacher bonuses, but some teachers said they would rather have the long-term opportunity to improve their teaching and leadership skills rather than a short-term bonus that might not go toward their salaries in the future.

“I want a leadership role, but I want to be a teacher — I don’t want to be an administrator,” said Allison Larty, a teacher in Noblesville and Teach Plus policy fellow. “(A bonus) is not going to be make an impact. The creation of career pathways will make an impact in the long run.”

But those dollars were eliminated in the Senate budget and the budget compromise. Rep. Tim Brown, chairman of the House Ways & Means Committee, said it came down to Senate negotiations. Senators were willing to spend more on preschool, Brown said, if they didn’t have to spend elsewhere — so career pathways dollars were cut.

But lawmakers did agree to change the state’s now $30 million teacher bonus program, which came under fire from educators across the state last year for rewarding effective teachers in high-performing, usually affluent schools at a higher level than similar teachers in lower-performing schools.

Going forward, the program will dole out money based on a policy created by each school district, rather than ISTEP scores. Under the plan, the state would distribute $30 per student to each district, which would then divvy up the local bonus pool among teachers rated “effective” or “highly effective.” Of that money, up to 50 percent can be added into a teacher’s base salary so that the teacher receives it in future years as well. And teachers in virtual schools can receive these bonuses — something the Senate had moved against.

The compromise plan keeps other requirements suggested by the Senate for virtual schools, mandating that they report information about class size, teacher-per-student ratios, and how often teachers have in-person meetings to the education department each year. Virtual schools would get 90 percent of the basic per-student funding amount from the state, as they do now. (The House’s plan would have increased that to 100 percent.)

The state’s voucher program would see its funding grow over the next two years under the compromise plan. Indiana is projected to spend more than $156 million by 2018 and $167 million by 2019 on the program, up from $146 million in 2017.

This new agreement no longer carves out the voucher money as a budget line item. Critics of making it a line item said it made the program vulnerable to cuts, but supporters applauded the change because they said it increased transparency around how much the state spends on vouchers but pulling it out of school-by-school calculations and placing it squarely in the budget itself.

The budget also includes:

  • $22 million per year for the state’s preschool program, up from about $12 million. $1 million per year is set aside for “in-home” online preschool programs.
  • About $32 million for English-language learners, up from about $20 million. The grant would be $250 per English-learner student in 2018 and $300 per student in 2019. Schools with higher concentrations of English learners would get additional funding.
  • $3 million per year to improve school internet access.
  • $5 million over two years in incentive grants for schools and districts that consolidate services.
  • $10.4 million for Advanced Placement tests and $4.1 million for PSAT tests.
  • $1 million to align initiatives in science, technology, engineering and math.
  • $500,000 per year for dual language immersion programs.
  • $26.3 million per year for testing and $12.3 million per year for remediation testing.
  • $15 million per year for the Charter and Innovation Network School Grant Program, which would support schools that want to become “innovation schools.”

Chalkbeat reporter Dylan Peers McCoy contributed to this story.

 

life support

Partisan bickering puts financial lifeline for rural schools in danger

PHOTO: Nicholas Garcia
Students at Merino Elementary School work during class.

A bill that would send hundreds of millions of dollars to Colorado’s rural schools faces an uncertain future after party leaders in both legislative chambers Thursday accused each other of not negotiating in good faith.

The multifaceted bill is one of the most complicated of the session. It would send money to rural hospitals, roads and schools. But if lawmakers fail to resolve their differences, hospitals would face severe cuts — forcing some in rural areas to close altogether.

What makes Senate Bill 267 so controversial is that the cornerstone of the bill would redesignate a fee collected by the state that helps pay for Medicaid.

The money the state collects from hospital patients is funneled to the state’s general operating budget. The state’s constitution limits how much that pot of money can grow each year. The bill would redirect the hospital fee to an enterprise account that isn’t subject to that constitutional provision.

Democrats have wanted to redesignate the hospital fee since 2015. They believe reclassifying the fee would elevate some budgetary pressures that have forced schools and other state services to be underfunded. Republicans have staunchly opposed the change. They’ve said it would violate the constitution and the will of voters.

State Sen. Jerry Sonnenberg, a Sterling Republican, changed his mind this year after seeing the potential cuts to rural hospitals. He introduced the bill with state Sen. Lucia Guzman, a Denver Democrat, and state Reps. K.C. Becker, a Boulder Democrat, and Jon Becker, a Fort Morgan Republican.

The bill was always a long shot. There are plenty of provisions neither chamber liked. And it would potentially take a coalition of both parties to pass the bill

But a disagreement over whether the state should lower its spending gap in tandem with redesignating the fee has thrown negotiations into further peril.

Early Thursday, Sonnenberg told reporters he was done negotiating with Democrats. He signaled he would kill the bill that was scheduled for a second hearing later in the morning. While he backed away from his threat, he took shots at Democrats.

“We didn’t kill it,” he told Chalkbeat after sparing the bill. “I’m not ready to give up. But I’m close.”

Sonnenberg said he believes he’s given Democrats more than he should, increasing the amount he’d cap government spending at. But that hasn’t been enough for them, he said.
“I want to save hospitals,” he said. “They want more tax dollars.”

Democrats said they’re concerned the bill as written would trigger another round of budget cuts to all government services, including schools

“It puts our budget in problem territory in no time at all,” said Becker, the Boulder Democrat.

“The numbers just don’t add up,” said Speaker Crisanta Duran, a Denver Democrat.

House Democrats said they’re hoping to restart negotiations soon and will offer “creative solutions.”

Senate Bill 267 is scheduled for another hearing Tuesday.

“We are still holding out hope for rural schools,” said Michelle Murphy, executive director of the Rural Alliance, which represents the state’s rural schools. “We’re grateful to Sen. Sonnenberg and the bill’s other sponsors for their leadership and efforts to bring critical resources to rural communities.”