Who Is In Charge

One health bill dies, one lives for now

A bill to require that high schools students learn CPR was politely killed in one Senate Committee Thursday while another measure to ban – sort of – trans fats in school food squeaked out of another panel.

Democratic Sens. Evie Hudak of Westminster (left) and Linda Newell of Littleton
Democratic Sens. Evie Hudak of Westminster (left) and Linda Newell of Littleton had a tough time in the Senate Education Committee on Feb. 16, 2012.

The Senate Education Committee also sparred for a few rounds with a complicated school discipline bill but declared the match a draw and delayed a vote for another day.

All that happened during what turned out to be a very long afternoon – extending into the evening – in the Senate education and agriculture committees.

Senate Education spent about an hour listening to witnesses testify in favor of Senate Bill 12-098, which as originally introduced would have required high schools students to learn CPR as a requirement for high school graduation.

The committee patiently listened to pitches from sponsor Sen. Suzanne Williams, D-Aurora, and from doctors, paramedics and heart attack survivors about the need for the bill and the importance of immediate intervention for heart attack victims.

A school principal and a superintendent testified against the bill as an unnecessary mandate on school districts already struggling with budget cuts and education-reform mandates.

Williams offered an amendment that made CPR training advisory, not mandatory for school districts, but the committee wasn’t persuaded. The panel rejected the amendment and then killed the bill on a 5-0 vote.

Trans fat ban has better luck

Another health-related mandate, Senate Bill 12-068, was on the agenda of the Senate Agriculture, Natural Resources and Energy Committee, meeting in another wing of the Capitol Thursday afternoon.

As originally introduced, the bill would have banned the serving of any food containing trans fats at schools. School district lobbyists opposed the bill as an unnecessary and potentially costly mandate on hard-pressed districts.

Some of those lobbyists testified against the bill, but there was a parade of supporting witnesses, including a beefy school chef, a chiropractor who said he specializes in anti-aging measures and a heart-disease survivor.

Sponsor Sen. Lucia Guzman, D-Denver, offered three amendments that weakened the bill, and the committee approved those. The amendments would delay the effective date of the bill until Sept. 1, 2013; exempt food provide at fund-raising events and exempt schools with fewer than 1,000 students from the bill.

The bill now goes to the Senate Appropriation Committee. If it survives that review and the full Senate, it still has to go through the House, and school district lobbyists are still gunning to kill the bill.

Discipline bill flummoxes Senate Ed

Senate Bill 12-046 is one of those big, years-in-the-making bills that is very complicated – and that proved to be a problem on Thursday.

The heart of the bill would roll back existing “zero-tolerance” policies that drive student arrests and suspensions and give schools more discretion in dealing with students missteps and make suspensions, expulsions and police citations that last resorts in student discipline.

The bill came from a study committee that was created by the 2010 legislature, but reaching agreement among school administrators, police, district attorneys, youth advocates and other interest group has been an onerous process.

The bill went through seven versions before being presented to Senate Ed on Thursday.

But that proved to be not enough, and committee Chair Sen. Bob Bacon, D-Fort Collins – more than four hours after the committee convened – laid the bill over for later discussion. He told the sponsors, Democratic Sens. Linda Newell of Littleton and Evie Hudak of Westminster, to come back with a new, clean version.

Committee members didn’t have a problem with the concept of rolling back zero-tolerance laws, but they had a lot of concerns about the bill’s detailed requirements for reporting and compiling of data about student arrests and disciplinary actions.

For the record

The full Senate Thursday morning gave final, 33-0 approval to four education-related bills, including:

  • Senate Bill 12-067, requiring all charter schools to be non-profit organizations.
  • Senate Bill 12-061, establishing new requirements for charter school operations and authorization.
  • Senate Bill 12-045, creating a mechanism for students to combine community and four-year college credits to earn associate’s degrees.
  • Senate Bill 12-036, updating state law on the requirement for parental consent to certain kinds of school surveys and questionnaires.


Use the Education Bill Tracker for links to bill texts and status information.

listening tour

We asked six Colorado school board members what they want from the state’s next governor. Here’s what they said.

Democratic gubernatorial candidates Donna Lynne, Noel Ginsburg and Cary Kennedy at a candidate forum hosted by the Colorado Association of School Boards. (Photo by Nic Garcia)

Late last week, nine candidates for Colorado governor came together to talk education, addressing an annual fall conference of school board members.

Now, we’re giving some of those audience members a chance to speak up.

Before the gubernatorial hopefuls took the stage, Chalkbeat recorded interviews with a half-dozen school board members who represent districts across the state. Our question to them: What are the big education questions you hope the next governor will take on?

Not surprisingly, funding challenges came up time and again.

One school board member asked for a more predictable budget. Another asked for schools to get their fair share of annual increases in new tax dollars. One went so far as to say the next governor would be a chicken if he or she didn’t take on reforming the state’s tax code.

We also heard a desire for leadership on solving teacher shortages, expanding vocational training and rethinking the state’s school accountability system.

Here are the six gubernatorial wishes we heard from Colorado’s school board members:

Reform TABOR to send more money to schools

Wendy Pottorff, Limon Public Schools

Since the Great Recession, Colorado schools have lost hundreds of thousands of dollars. And while the state legislature has tried to close its education funding shortfall, lawmakers haven’t been able to keep up. Getting in the way, Pottorff says, is the state’s Taxpayer Bill of Rights, or TABOR.

Change the conversation about public schools


Paul Reich, Telluride School District

Reich says public schools are under attack under the false premise that they’re failing — and that isn’t helping the state recruit bright young teachers. He said the next governor must change the conversation about schools to make teaching a more desirable profession.

Provide a clear budget forecast

Anne Guettler, Garfield School District

Approving a school district’s budget is one of the many responsibilities of a Colorado school board. That’s a tall challenge when the state’s budget is constantly in flux, Guettler says. She hopes the next governor can help provide a clearer economic forecast for schools.

Rethink school accountability to include students and parents

Greg Piotraschke, Brighton 27J

Colorado schools are subject to annual quality reviews by the state’s education department. And it’s time for the state to rethink what defines a high-quality school, Piotraschke said. He suggested the governor could help rethink everything from how the state uses standardized tests to how to incorporate parents and students into the review process.

Give schools more resources to train the state’s high-tech workforce

Nora Brown, Colorado Springs District 11

In light of Colorado growing tech sector, several gubernatorial candidates have come out in support of more technical training for Colorado students. But that costs money, Brown says. The Colorado Springs school board member said promising better job training for high school students without more resources is empty.

Remember there’s a difference between urban and rural schools

Mark Hillman, Burlington School District

Crafting statewide policy is an onerous task in Colorado, given the diversity of the state’s 178 school districts. Hillman said the next governor must remember that any legislation he or she signs will play out 178 different ways, so they must be careful to not put more undue pressure on the state’s smallest school districts.

Colorado Votes 2018

Five things we learned when Colorado’s gubernatorial candidates got on the same stage to talk about education

Colorado Republicans running for governor addressed some of the state's school board members at a forum hosted by the state's association of school boards. From left are George Brauchler, Steve Barlock, Greg Lopez, Victor Mitchell and Doug Robinson. (Photo by Nic Garcia/Chalkbeat)

Nine Republicans and Democrats hoping to become Colorado’s next governor offered contrasting views Friday of the state’s public schools to an audience of more than 100 local school board members.

Most of the five Republicans told the crowd of locally elected officials — who are charged by the state’s constitution with governing Colorado’s public schools — that their programs were in need of improvement and innovation, and that they were there to help.

The four Democrats hoping to succeed fellow Democrat Gov. John Hickenlooper, who is term-limited, pledged to reform the state’s tax code to send more money to schools.

The candidates spoke at the annual fall delegation conference of the state’s association of school boards.It was the first forum of its kind to address education issues exclusively this election election cycle.

Unlike previous elections, Colorado’s public education system has been a key policy debate early in the campaign. Several candidates, especially Democrats, have worked on education issues before.

Here are our five takeaways from the forum:

The Republican candidates didn’t pull any punches when they said the state’s public schools were in need of improvement — and several said that they were the ones to do it.

From District Attorney George Brauchler to businessman Doug Robinson, every Republican candidate said one part or another of the state’s school system needed to do better.

“Education is life itself,” said former state lawmaker Victor Mitchell. “And there is no greater challenge facing our state than 50 percent of our at-risk kids who graduate can’t complete college-level course work.”

Both Mitchell and Robinson pointed to their experience as entrepreneurs as evidence that they could help set the state’s schools free of what they consider unnecessary red tape. Brauchler called for empowering teachers and parents.

Every Democrat and several Republicans agreed that the state’s schools were in a “funding crisis.” But they offered very different paths forward.

It was an easy question for Democrats. Businessman Noel Ginsburg, former state Sen. Michael Johnston, former state treasurer Cary Kennedy and Lt. Gov. Donna Lynne were in lock-step that the state’s schools are in need of more money.

“If we don’t fundamentally solve this crisis, the rest of the issues don’t matter,” Johnston said.

Former state Sen. Michael Johnston and Lt. Gov. Donna Lynne talk after a forum for gubernatorial candidates. Both are Democrats. (Photo by Nic Garcia/Chalkbeat)

Johnston and Kennedy forcefully pledged to take on the state’s Taxpayer Bill of Rights, which limits how much tax revenue the state can collect and requires voter approval to raise taxes.

Lynne was more tempered. While she acknowledged tax reform was needed, she said wanted a legislative committee working on school finance to complete its work before suggesting any overhauls.

Greg Lopez, the former mayor of Parker and a small business owner, was the only GOP candidate who said he would take on the state’s complicated tax laws. If elected, he promised to establish a committee to send a reform proposal to voters.

Robinson and Brauchler acknowledged that schools were in a funding crunch. But they stopped short of saying they’d send more money to schools.

Mitchell said “he wasn’t sure” if there was a funding crisis, but added, “The system should be reformed before it’s fully funded.”

PERA, the state’s employee retirement program, could play a prominent issue in the election — especially for Republicans.

Earlier at the conference, school board members received a briefing on a proposed overhaul to the state’s retirement program, which includes school district employees.

While the situation is not as dire as it was a decade ago, the program’s governing board has become so increasingly worried about unfunded liabilities that it’s asking state lawmakers to pass a reform package to provide more financial stability.

Two Republicans, Brauchler and Steve Barlock, who co-chaired President Trump’s campaign in Colorado, said PERA was in crisis. Barlock warned school board members that their budgets were in jeopardy as lawmakers fiddle with the system.

Neither went into any detail about how they hoped to see the retirement program made more fiscally stable. But watch for this issue to gain greater traction on the campaign trail, especially as Republican state Treasurer Walker Stapleton ramps up his gubernatorial campaign, and as lawmakers begin to wrestle with PERA reforms next year. (Stapleton did not attend the forum.)

Some candidates offered careful responses to a question about school choice. Others, not so much.

Every Democrat and one Republican, Brauchler, said they respected a family’s right to choose the best school for their children. But that choice, they said, should not come at the expense of traditional, district-run schools.

“I’m concerned that we’d build a system where the success of some schools is coming at the expense of other schools,” Kennedy said.

Republicans strongly supported charter schools, and in some cases, vouchers that use taxpayer dollars to pay for private schools. Robinson called on creating new ways to authorize charter schools. Mitchell said he wanted to repeal a provision in the state’s constitution that has been used to rebuff private school vouchers.

There’s no party line over rural schools.

Republicans and Democrats alike said the state needed to step up to help its rural schools, which are typically underfunded compared to schools along the Front Range. They need more teachers, better infrastructure and fewer regulations, the candidates said.

“We need to get rural areas into the modern age,” Robinson said.