deja vu

Plan to allow more unlicensed educators dies again. Can the surviving bill fix teacher shortages?

PHOTO: Alan Petersime
Third grade teacher Alyssa Roberts works on her lesson plan at Tindley Renaissance School. The bill's previous language would have let districts hire unlicensed teachers like charter schools can.

A controversial measure that would have allowed school districts to hire more unlicensed teachers appears to be dead this session, leaving behind a bill that some lawmakers and advocates say does little to address the state’s teacher shortage.

The measure, which would have allowed districts to have up to 10 percent of their staff be unlicensed, has been added and removed from Senate Bill 387 several times this year and was removed altogether Monday by its author, Sen. Andy Zay, a Republican from Huntington.

Zay said he and other lawmakers decided to remove the language both because college graduates can already get emergency permits from the state to teach and because he didn’t want to add even more regulations and permits to Indiana’s roster.

“There are nine different licenses available now and/or permits to allow folks to come into our classrooms,” Zay said. “We have a lot of availability right now.”

The remaining parts of the bill make small changes to licensure and pay scales that aim to attract and retain teachers, but they’re not necessarily the kinds of measures that could reverse teaching shortages across the state, said Rep. Vernon Smith, a Democrat from Gary.

“We’re not getting to the root of the problems,” Smith said.

A former principal, Smith said he believes there are three reasons more people aren’t pursuing teaching: Pay, discipline issues in schools, and the recently criticized teacher licensure tests, which some educators and prospective teachers have said are too difficult and are keeping potentially qualified teachers out of the classroom.

In 2017, 6,160 college graduates earned an initial practitioner license, the credential that first-time teachers, administrators and other educators need to work in an Indiana school — up by about 35 percent compared to 2016, when 4,552 earned it, according to state data. The 2017 number isn’t just teachers, but also includes two superintendents, 612 principals, 149 school counselors, 33 psychologists and 32 social workers.

Although the state has issued more educator licenses over the past few years, educators have still come to lawmakers saying they struggle to find teachers in certain subjects, such as math, technical subjects and special education.

Indiana lawmakers turned their attention to reducing teacher shortages in 2015, when initial licenses hit a low point and news of a statewide shortage heightened concerns despite mixed data about how pervasive the shortage might be. But that next year, legislators failed to pass several bills that intended to address shortages by changing teacher mentoring programs and pay, among other things. The only measure to pass was a smaller-scale scholarship bill for high-achieving students across the state to go to college each year to become teachers.

Since then, a few other bills have passed that would require the state to grant Indiana licenses to teachers licensed in other states and allow districts to offer extra pay to those who teach advanced courses and who agree to mentor new teachers.

Zay said he thought this year’s bill wasn’t “the be-all, end-all,” but that it laid the groundwork for the state to continue examining its teacher licensure policy going forward.

With just three days left in this year’s legislative session, it’s not uncommon that legislators make swift, sweeping revisions to bills so that they have a chance of advancing. The teacher licensing language, which is similar to existing law for charter schools, has seen a lot of community feedback, much of it negative. The state’s teachers unions opposed the bill, as has former state Superintendent Glenda Ritz, who encouraged the state instead to support existing paths to licensure.

Union advocates spoke against a provision still in the bill that would allow districts to give certain teachers extra pay, an issue that’s been hotly debated in Indiana for years. Like teachers of advanced courses, elementary teachers who earn master’s degrees in math, reading or literacy could also receive an extra stipend. That money would not necessarily recur year after year, and it would not be able to be negotiated.

“You’re trying to fix a problem … that cannot be fixed solely with the supplemental pay issue,” said Sally Sloan, lobbyist for the Indiana Federation of Teachers. “Every year you are going to need to come back and put another category in there unless we address why people are not coming into teaching or why they are not staying.”

Separately, districts would still have the flexibility to give some teachers larger raises than others if unions agree to it in contract negotiations. The measure might encourage younger teachers with lower base pay to stick with teaching, administrators said. Teachers unions said they supported this measure.

Zay said State Superintendent Jennifer McCormick originally came to him with the idea for the legislation, which was reflected in her 2018 legislative agenda. Initially, the bill mostly addressed teacher licensure exams. In the compromise version of the bill, the Indiana Department of Education would still have to study other licensure test options, including national tests.

The bill also makes changes to the state’s career specialist permit, which was created to attract career-changers to the teaching field who might have expertise in other subjects.

Rep. Bob Behning, an Indianapolis Republican, asked to add back a House proposal that would require career specialists to pass an exam showing they understand how students learn and the practice of teaching, in addition to content exams. The bill also removes a provision from the current version of the permit that says a career specialist must have a bachelor’s degree in the area they wish to teach in.

The permit changes could make it easier for some prospective teachers to gain licenses, particularly those from technical fields where a college degree might not be required. But they also ensure a teacher has training in more than just their content area, a priority educators have pushed as licenses have undergone changes in the past few years.

The new version of the bill must still pass both houses before it could become law. Lawmakers are expected to adjourn Wednesday.

Indiana's 2018 legislative session

What’s so hard about teaching ‘soft skills’? More than Indiana policymakers might think

PHOTO: Shaina Cavazos
Students at Robey Elementary School in Wayne Township.

Indiana schools have a long list of specific topics students must learn about before they graduate that are enshrined in state law — the U.S. Constitution, the Holocaust, the effects of alcohol and drugs. Soon, “employability skills” will join them.

Also known as “soft skills” and “21st Century Skills,” these are the intangible abilities that students might be expected to have once they graduate from high schools, and they have been part of the school experience for decades. Sometimes the skills in question focus more on character or morality, while other times — especially in high schools — they focus on job-readiness. But they all boil down to figuring out how to teach students skills that are academics-adjacent and, often, hard to measure.

While schools have been trying to teach these skills for years, they have been highlighted recently by policymakers and employers as critical for post-high school success. But, education researchers and advocates worry, legislating these programs can be a challenge — and might not lead to noticeable changes.

“Good schools have always done this,” said Andrew Rotherham, co-founder of Bellwether Education Partners, a national nonprofit that advocates for school choice. “But what often happens is it’s just one more thing that people have to do, and they end up checking that box.”

Under a law that passed this past spring with broad bipartisan support, all schools will have to incorporate these skills into their lessons beginning in 2019. The law comes as Indiana policymakers have made a big push to encourage “college- and career-readiness,” an education buzzword that has permeated conversations about recently adopted graduation requirements and city-led college access projects.

The bill itself is vague and says schools have to teach these skills across all subjects and occasionally create activities or special events on career awareness and development. The topics to be taught are specific to grade levels, spanning “basic employment concepts,” choosing careers based on interests and skills, job or higher education counseling, hands-on experiences, and workplace visits.

There is no method laid out for measuring schools’ performance or assessing the material.

The idea for the bill came from Indiana State Board of Education member David Freitas, who has long lobbied for such policies. The message could be as broad as encouraging conscientiousness and punctuality or as specific as teachers greeting each student in the morning with a firm handshake.

“These are core foundational skills that every person should have,” Freitas said. “It’s relevant today, it was relevant yesterday, and it’s going to be relevant tomorrow.”

The model that Indiana schools will have to eventually follow first requires the Indiana Department of Education to create employability skill standards, which the state board will eventually have to approve.

State officials won’t necessarily be starting from scratch — The U.S. Department of Education has developed an outline for teaching these skills and resources for schools, such as a checklist of academic and critical thinking skills that can be used to build lessons.

Indiana’s biggest challenges likely will be rolling the policy out in a way that ensures these skills are actually taught, taught well, and don’t become an “unfunded mandate.”

Jonathan Plucker, a professor and researcher at Johns Hopkins University who studies education policy and talent development, whose work has centered on designing assessments to measure topics like creativity and collaboration, said requiring schools to teach the skills can be a bigger obstacle than states realize.

“We don’t have great assessments for a lot of these things, so it is difficult to gauge whether you are doing a good job teaching students,” Plucker said. “There’s nothing in here about accountability, reporting, monitoring or assessment, and that’s how we ensure policies get enacted. You would never write a tax bill without any of those things.”oh

Plucker also thinks schools need to think long-term about what skills students may need in the future, not preparing them for the current job market.

“It would be much more powerful to take the longer-haul view of how are we educating them for the jobs of tomorrow, like where are we working in creativity and communication skills, collaboration skills?” Plucker said. “How are we helping them prepare for the jobs that we know are going to be the vast majority of career opportunities when they get out?”

Some schools already have programs in place. At Robey Elementary School in Wayne Township, their version of a soft skills program has focused on positive behavior. As the Robey Rockets, their motto is “BLAST” — Be Respectful, Lifelong learning, Active listening, Safety, Taking responsibility.

Most schools in the district have something similar, Principal Ben Markley said. The Garden City Gators have the three Gs, while the Bridgeport Knights have an “ARMOR” shield. In other districts, such as Franklin Township, South Creek Elementary School uses “GREAT” to encourage Generosity, Respect, Effort, positive Attitude, and Trustworthiness. It might seem simple, but Markley said he’s noticed its effects.

“You’ve got to have a common language,” Markley said. “When students go to physical education class or to art or to music … having a framework that they can count on, that they can improve upon over time, it is something that makes a difference for our kids.”

It’s unclear how much implementing the program will cost. Fiscal analysts from the Legislative Services Agency said the provisions in Senate Bill 297 would increase work for state education department employees, as well as districts carrying out another piece of the legislation — the Work Ethic Certificate program. The program is currently being tried out in 18 districts, and it partners districts and local employers together to create a credential students can earn if they demonstrate employability skills while in high school.

The Department of Workforce Development has issued grants to districts to support their work, but this year’s bill didn’t include any additional funding to expand the work ethic certificate program. It’s possible that could come next year, when lawmakers meet to craft the state’s next two-year budget.

Freitas said he’s really excited to see the plans take shape, and he knows some schools might already be working on these skills without the state requiring it. He said it’s not necessary that they hire any special teachers — it’s about focusing on the lessons and working soft skills into what’s already being taught.

“I see it embedded within the curriculum,” Freitas said. “Ten years from now, I think it’s important for everyone to be respectful to each other, civil to each other. So it has nothing to do with, ‘are they skills for the future’ — yeah, they are skills for the future. They are not going to change.”

Indiana's 2018 legislative session

Here’s what the Gary and Muncie takeover bill could mean for other Indiana districts

PHOTO: Shaina Cavazos
Rep. Tim Brown, the author of House Bill 1315, makes his closing remarks.

Disregarding opposition from teachers and local leaders, Indiana lawmakers overwhelmingly voted Monday to strip power from the Gary and Muncie school boards, potentially eliminate the Muncie teachers union and place the district under outside control — and exempt it from required annual performance reports.

The groundbreaking bill delivers control of Muncie public schools to Ball State University, which has never run a public school district (although it currently operates two schools in the area), and frees Muncie from state performance reports imposed on other school districts.

During Monday’s special legislative session to wrap up unfinished work, a far-reaching district takeover bill easily passed — 63-30 in the House and 34-14 in the Senate — with dissent primarily from Democrats. The bill next heads to Gov. Eric Holcomb, who is likely to sign it.

Opponents said the bill infringes on residents’ control and stifles public input.

“Teachers in Muncie are despondent,” said Pat Kennedy, Muncie’s teachers union president. “Ball State keeps talking about partnership, but in a partnership both parties have meaningful impact, and this bill does not allow for that.”

Fortifying unprecedented legislation last year that enabled the state to intervene in Gary and Muncie, this year’s House Bill 1315 would put the Muncie district under the control of Ball State University, further empower Gary’s emergency manager, and effectively turn both districts’ elected boards of education into figureheads.

Read: Race can’t be ignored in takeover of Gary and Muncie schools, civic leaders say

For Indiana, district takeovers are uncharted territory, even though other states have seized such power with mixed results. Although the bill specifies the Gary and Muncie school districts, it alters state education policy in ways that could affect the rest of the state.

Rep. Tim Brown, a Republican from Crawfordsville and the bill’s author, said the bill gives troubled districts more opportunities to turn themselves around sooner.

“To say we’re going to do it the same way is just banging out head against the wall,” Brown said. “We have to change as we go forward because the times demand we change.”

Here are four key takeaways:

A-F grades for Muncie schools may disappear, a departure from Indiana’s history pushing school accountability

In an effort to encourage “innovative strategies,” the bill would free Ball State from reporting Muncie schools’ performance via the annual A-F grades measuring school and district improvement.

The provision represents a big step back from the version of  high-stakes school accountability touted by Republicans. Former Gov. Mike Pence often said that if students can be graded every day, schools can be graded every year.

Participation in state ratings would be optional for Ball State. State grades can come with serious consequences if schools reach four years of Fs, including closure or takeover.

School and district leaders have told policymakers and lawmakers frequently that letter grades don’t tell the whole story of their students — even state Superintendent Jennifer McCormick has echoed those sentiments.

Although some very small schools escape state ratings, Muncie would become the only district exempt from state grading, Indiana Department of Education’s spokesman Adam Baker said.

Because Ball State wouldn’t take control until later this summer, Muncie will still receive a letter grade for the current school year.

However, the district will still be subject to  federal law, which requires releasing a rating based on test scores, graduation rates, and other student and school achievement data. That measure will be calculated on a 100-point scale similar to the state’s A-F grades.

District finances will receive higher scrutiny, but much of that will be in private.

House Bill 1315 also creates a way for the state to intervene in districts experiencing financial hardship.

If a district meets certain financial criteria — which could be based on enrollment, cash balances, deficits or financial trends — the state’s Distressed Unit Appeal Board could require it to follow a “corrective action plan.” Failure to follow that plan or to make enough improvements could land the district on a financial watchlist.

That would be much earlier and more intensive financial intervention than is currently spelled out for schools.

Yet all deliberations about the action plan would be in secret, unless the district were placed on a watchlist. That means families and even teachers might not know about district-state finance plans.

Lawmakers defended the secrecy as a way to reassure district officials and prevent families from fleeing because of potential financial trouble.

“The concerns from school officials were they didn’t want flight just because they were asking for some help,” Brown said. “This bill allows some process for a gradual assistance … It won’t be a cliff.”

But some open-government advocates have called it a dangerous move that excludes the public from important discussions in communities.

The bill “robs the public of the ability to push their school boards to accept the help” of state officials and doesn’t give people the chance to speak out about difficult decisions facing their schools, said Steve Key, executive director and general counsel for the Hoosier State Press Association. “All of that is being done behind closed doors.”

Muncie stands to lose some stigma around takeover, but also potentially its union.

With Ball State taking control, Muncie would no longer be designated a “distressed” district. That might  lend credibility to the district, which has seen years of financial mismanagement.

But the move also could destroy the district’s teachers union. Ball State will get to decide whether Muncie teachers may retain their exclusive representative. So far, said Muncie teachers union President Pat Kennedy, it’s not clear what the answer will be, nor how the process for negotiating future teachers contracts would work.

Kennedy said teachers in Muncie feel like they’ve lost their voices in the process, and some see the change as punishment for the poor decision-making of previous administrators.

“This isn’t about the quality of Ball State as an institution,” Kennedy said. “What is the real value of this bill other than to take away teacher rights?”

Gary leaders worry about losing local control and input.

Gary public schools will continue to be run by its emergency manager, Peggy Hinckley, a former interim superintendent in Indianapolis Public Schools. Lawmakers from the area said that Hinckley, who has been on the job about a year, is helping get the district back on track.

Sen. Eddie Melton, a Democrat from Northwest Indiana, and others on Monday said that House Bill 1315 adds upheaval to an already difficult process that hasn’t had time to do what lawmakers created it to do. It also wasn’t urgent enough to quickly move ahead in a one-day special session, he said.

“This bill is not an emergency, and it does not contribute to building up the overall educational quality in Gary,” Melton said.

The bill demotes Gary’s elected school board to an advisory board that only can meet up to four times a year, and Hinckley is no longer required to consult with its members.

Indiana Democrats also said the bill could be a harbinger of future takeovers, and that other legislators should be sensitive to that before they vote for dramatic changes to others’ communities.

“Yes, it’s Gary today,” said Rep. Charlie Brown, a Democrat from the area. “But it could be you tomorrow.”