Funding fight

Trump’s voucher plan would strip funding from over 1,200 schools in New York City, union analysis shows

PHOTO: RJ Sangosti/The Denver Post

Just two days before the U.S. Senate begins its confirmation hearing for Betsy DeVos — Donald Trump’s pick to lead the country’s education department — New York City’s teachers union took a swipe at Trump’s central education policy proposal.

The United Federation of Teachers said Monday that Trump’s plan to create a sweeping and publicly funded voucher system would sap funding from 1,265 schools in New York City, resulting in larger class sizes, fewer teachers, and cuts to after-school programs.

Trump has endorsed the idea of shifting $20 billion in federal funds toward vouchers, a plan that is widely assumed to involve reallocating Title I funding currently designated for schools based on the proportion of low-income students they serve.

If that happens, “The damage would spread through the system, raising class sizes even in non-Title I schools, threatening academic enrichment programs, guidance, art and music and other services our children depend on,” UFT President Michael Mulgrew said in a press release.

“We need to hear in detail from Ms. DeVos — a fervent advocate of vouchers and charter schools — what the administration’s plan is for Title I.”

In all, the union said, traditional public schools in New York City stand to lose at least $500 million, which could directly affect 700,000 students. That funding stream represents nearly 40 percent of the federal money directed to the city’s education department, and almost 3 percent of its $23 billion operating budget.

During the campaign, Trump said he would use federal money to finance vouchers for low-income students to attend parochial or private schools. DeVos is a natural pick to advance that policy: She has zealously supported such programs at the state level, and created a successful political action committee to support pro-voucher candidates nationally.

But whether such a program would ever get off the ground in New York is a whole other question. As it stands, Trump’s voucher proposal assumes that state legislatures will pick up most of the tab — in New York state, that is likely a political non-starter. And even if the legislature did kick in support, the state constitution bars public financing of religious schools, which comprise the vast majority of the city’s private schools.

Still, it’s not hard to imagine DeVos will continue to support policies that shift resources away from traditional public schools, generating pushback from the country’s largest teacher unions. (Randi Weingarten, the head of the national American Federation of Teachers, is scheduled to deliver a speech Monday that will likely outline objections to DeVos’ education record.)

The UFT’s analysis includes a list of New York City schools that stand to lose the most funding, which you can find here.

meet the candidates

These candidates are running for Detroit school board. Watch them introduce themselves.

Nine candidates are vying for two seats on Detroit's school board in November. Seven submitted photos.

One candidate tells of a childhood in a house without heat.

Another describes the two-hour commute he made to high school every day to build a future that would one day enable him to give back to Detroit.

A third says her work as a student activist inspired her to run for school board as a recent high school grad.

These candidates are among nine people vying for two seats up for grabs on Detroit’s seven-member school board on Nov. 6. That includes one incumbent and many graduates of the district.

Chalkbeat is partnering with Citizen Detroit to present a school board candidate forum Thursday, Sept. 20 from 5:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m., at IBEW Local 58, 1358 Abbott St., Detroit.

Participants will have the opportunity to meet each candidate and ask questions in a speed-dating format.

In anticipation of that event, Citizen Detroit invited each of the candidates to make a short video introducing themselves to voters. Seven candidates made videos.

Watch them here:

School safety

Report lists litany of failings over police in Chicago schools

PHOTO: Scott Olson/Getty Images
Police officers stand alongside Lake Shore Drive in August as protesters decry violence and lack of investment in African-American neighborhoods and schools

The Chicago Police Department doesn’t adequately screen and train the officers it assigns to Chicago Public Schools, and their roles in schools are poorly defined, according to a sharply critical report released today by the Office of Inspector General Joseph Ferguson.

The report lists a litany of failings, including basic administration: There is no current agreement between the police department and the district governing the deployment of school resource officers, or SROs, and neither the schools nor the police even have a current list of the officers working in schools this year.

The inspector general’s report also mentions several sets of SRO resources and best practices created and endorsed by the federal government, then notes that Chicago hasn’t adopted any of them. “CPD’s current lack of guidance and structure for SROs amplifies community concerns and underscores the high probability that students are unnecessarily becoming involved in the criminal justice system, despite the availability of alternate solutions,” says the report.

Chalkbeat reported in August about incidents in which SROs used batons and tasers on students while intervening in routine disciplinary matters.

Scrutiny of SROs is nothing new, and is part of the broader CPD consent decree brokered this week between Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan. That agreement calls for better training and vetting of SROs, as well as a clearer delineation of their roles on campuses—including a prohibition against participating in routine school discipline — beginning with the 2019-20 school year.

Read more: How the police consent decree could impact Chicago schools

But the report from Ferguson’s office says that the consent decree doesn’t go far enough. It chastises police for not pledging to include the community in the creation of its agreement with the school district, nor in the establishment of hiring guidelines; and for not creating a plan for evaluating SROs’ performance, among other recommendations. In addition, the report criticizes the police department for delaying the reforms until the 2019-20 school year. A draft of the inspector general’s report was given to the police department in early August in hopes that some of the issues could be resolved in time for the school year that began last week. The police department asked for an extension for its reply.