School Choice

Deputy mayor praises KIPP founder as some collaboration efforts continue

PHOTO: Geoff Decker
KIPP co-founder Dave Levin

Buery, a charter school founder himself, gave a warm introduction to Dave Levin on Tuesday, noting that one of his favorite books is “Work Hard. Be Nice.,” which chronicles Levin’s early days as a teacher and founder of KIPP, which started in Houston and is now the country’s largest charter school network.

Buery’s comments, made Tuesday at an event for district and charter school educators, serves as a reminder that the de Blasio administration’s position on charter schools is more nuanced than how it is often portrayed by pro-charter advocacy groups. Sometimes that perception is fueled by officials’ own comments, such as when de Blasio said he wasn’t going to support lifting the city’s charter school cap or when Chancellor Carmen Fariña recently suggested that some charter schools were inappropriately recruiting and pushing out students.

After Buery’s introduction, Levin gave an abbreviated version of his online course on character education to about 150 teachers and principals. The two-hour session was the latest example of a charter school leader stepping into the role of district school collaborator, something Chancellor Carmen Fariña has encouraged during her time at the department. Last month, Uncommon Schools hosted an all-day professional development conference tailored to district principals and teachers and, in October, Success Academy took visitors on a tour at two of its Harlem schools in the morning and hosted workshops in the afternoon.

NYC Collaborates, which hosted the event, emerged from the District-Charter Collaboration Compact, signed in 2010 by then-Chancellor Joel Klein amid the rapid expansion of charter schools during the Bloomberg administration. (Klein offered a less enthusiastic view of collaboration as a tool for improving the school system at an event promoting his book on Wednesday. “We’re not going to change it by kumbaya, building a bigger tent,” he said.)

Fariña serves on the board of the New York City Charter School Center, which operates NYC Collaborates, but was with de Blasio at an announcement about high school football safety during the event.

Most of Levin’s presentation explored the different ways school staff members can respond to the small interactions that make up a school day. One exercise called on participants to brainstorm ways to reinforce what he calls “positive psychology,” which prompted one teacher to say he wanted to say ‘good morning’ more often and another to say she would smile more while giving instructions.

In the video below, Levin demonstrates how a teacher should and should not react when a student gets stumped by a math problem.

new plan

Lawmakers want to allow appeals before low-rated private schools lose vouchers

PHOTO: Shaina Cavazos
Rep. Bob Behning, chairman of the House Education Committee, authored HB 1384, in which voucher language was added late last week.

Indiana House lawmakers signaled support today for a plan to loosen restrictions for private schools accepting state voucher dollars.

Two proposal were amended into the existing House Bill 1384, which is mostly aimed at clarifying how high school graduation rate is calculated. One would allow private schools to appeal to the Indiana State Board of Education to keep receiving vouchers even if they are repeatedly graded an F. The other would allow new “freeway” private schools the chance to begin receiving vouchers more quickly.

Indiana, already a state with one of the most robust taxpayer-funded voucher programs in the country, has made small steps toward broadening the program since the original voucher law passed in 2011 — and today’s amendments could represent two more if they become law. Vouchers shift state money from public schools to pay private school tuition for poor and middle class children.

Under current state law, private schools cannot accept new voucher students for one year after the school is graded a D or F for two straight years. If a school reaches a third year with low grades, it can’t accept new voucher students until it raises its grade to a C or higher for two consecutive years.

Rep. Bob Behning, R-Indianapolis, the bill’s author, said private schools should have the right to appeal those consequences to the state board.

Right now, he said, they “have no redress.”  But public schools, he said, can appeal to the state board.

Behning said the innovation schools and transformation zones in Indianapolis Public Schools were a “perfect example” for why schools need an appeal process because schools that otherwise would face state takeover or other sanctions can instead get a reprieve to start over with a new management approach.

In the case of troubled private schools receiving vouchers, Behning said, there should be an equal opportunity for the state board to allow them time to improve.

”There are tools already available for traditional public schools and for charters that are not available for vouchers,” he said.

But Democrats on the House Education Committee opposed both proposals, arguing they provided more leeway to private schools than traditional public schools have.

“Vouchers are supposed to be the answer, the cure-all, the panacea for what’s going on in traditional schools,” said Rep. Vernon Smith, D-Gary. “If you gave an amendment that said this would be possible for both of them, leveling the playing field, then I would support it.”

The second measure would allow the Indiana State Board of Education to consider a private school accredited and allow it to immediately begin receiving vouchers once it has entered into a contract to become a “freeway school” — a type of state accreditation that has few regulations and requirements compared to full accreditation.Typically, it might take a year or so to become officially accredited.

Indiana’s voucher program is projected to grow over the next two years to more than 38,000 students, at an anticipated cost — according to a House budget draft — of about $160 million in 2019. Currently in Indiana, there are 316 private schools that can accept vouchers.

The voucher amendments passed along party lines last week, and the entire bill passed out of committee today, 8-4. It next heads to the full House for a vote, likely later this week.

RIP

Senate plan to expand parents’ access to state education dollars dies in committee

PHOTO: Shaina Cavazos
The Senate Education Committee heard SB 534 on Wednesday.

A Senate plan that would’ve given parents of students with special needs direct access to their state education funding was killed yesterday — for now.

Sen. Dennis Kruse, R-Auburn, said during the Senate Education Committee hearing on the bill that there would be no vote on Senate Bill 534, which would’ve established “education savings accounts” for Indiana students with physical and learning disabilities. The plan would’ve been a major step forward for Indiana school choice advocates who have already backed the state’s charter school and voucher programs.

Kruse said there were still many questions about the bill.

“I don’t want a bill to leave our committee that still has a lot of work to be done on it,” Kruse said.

The Senate bill was one of two such plans winding its way through the 2017 Indiana General Assembly.

House Bill 1591 would create a similar program, but it would not be limited just to students needing special education. Authored by Rep. Jim Lucas, R-Seymour, the “radical” proposal is meant to give parents total control over their child’s education.

“The intent of 1591 is to give parents the choice and let the market work,” Lucas said. “…I want to get this conversation started.”

A hearing for the House bill has not been scheduled in the House Education Committee, led by Rep. Bob Behning, R-Indianapolis.

Education savings accounts are slowly gaining attention across the U.S.

Similar programs have passed state legislatures or are already operating in Tennessee, Florida, Arizona, Mississippi and Nevada. Advocates have called education savings account programs the purest form of school choice.

But critics of the savings accounts say they could divert even more money away from public schools and come with few regulations to protect against fraud and ensure families are spending the money according to the law.