Election 2016

Seasoned educators vying for state superintendent agree: Indiana schools need more money

The two candidates for state superintendent disagree about some issues, but when it comes to education funding, they’re both in agreement: Indiana schools need more money, they say.

Republican candidate Jennifer McCormick knows this personally after decades as teacher, principal and now the superintendent of Yorktown schools, she said.

Restrictions put in place over the past few years on what school districts can collect from property taxes mean districts have to more frequently ask voters to agree to pay more in taxes to support schools.

Read: The basics of school funding in Indiana: Difficulty defining fairness

“I’m at a district that has felt the (property tax caps),” McCormick said. “It is very alarming. I am struggling to replace buses. I am struggling to keep roofs in shape.”

READ: Find more on this year's races for superintendent, governor and IPS school board.
READ: Find more on this year’s races for superintendent, governor and IPS school board.

Incumbent Glenda Ritz, a Democrat and former Washington Township teacher, has had mixed success with proposals to increase funding in various areas since she took office, such as for technology, teacher leaders and students learning English. But recent state budgets haven’t necessarily had the same priorities. While English learners did see more financial support in 2015, some of the state’s poorest districts saw funding cuts, particularly those where enrollment has declined rapidly.

In general, aid for poor students decreased when parts of the state funding formula were adjusted in 2015. Ritz and McCormick both want to revisit that change with lawmakers next year.

“We are starting to starve some of our schools from lack of funding,” Ritz said.

Ritz has battled with legislators in the past over funding, most notably when it comes to expanding the amount of state funds that go toward charter schools and taxpayer-funded vouchers for private school tuition. She thinks the state’s system of distributing money based largely on enrollment — called money “following the child” — causes inequities in schools.

“There’s nothing fair about the funding mechanism that’s going on,” Ritz said at a presentation to the Indiana Coalition of Public Education this summer. “Every dollar following the child … at the outset that sounds like a really great idea. But every time that happens … there is no choice but to cut programming for kids.”

Overall, Ritz is asking lawmakers for a $455 million increase in the basic state funding amount for schools, about 2 percent per year.

McCormick hasn’t suggested a proposed budget total yet, but she and Ritz have other areas where they think more state support is necessary.

Both candidates are calling for more state funding for school technology and internet access, especially at a time when more schools are relying on online testing and computer-based instruction.

“We need to make sure schools are ready for what’s coming,” McCormick said.

Ritz and McCormick don’t agree on every funding issue. They differ when it comes to whether families should receive a tax credit for textbooks. Ritz says they should and has called for a $1,000 tax deduction — the same benefit that currently flows to private school families.

The Education Department estimates that public school parents could save $60 million over two years with a similar tax break.

“Let public school families get tax breaks for education materials available to private and homeschool families,” Ritz said during her announcement of legislative priorities earlier this year.

McCormick says she’s not sure whether any families should be getting that tax break.

“I’m not saying yes or no,” she said. “Be careful what you wish for … If you open it up to the masses, that’s tax revenue (the state is losing) — and what do we rely on? That’s our money.”

Indiana 2016 Election

The biggest donation in the IPS school board race came from an unexpected source

PHOTO: Dylan Peers McCoy

In the battle for control of the Indianapolis Public School board, the largest single campaign contribution came from an unexpected source: the teachers’ union. But the donation didn’t help the union-backed candidate.

In recent years, IPS board races have been dominated by pro-school reform candidates who have attracted large contributions from deep-pocketed donors. But in other elections — at other times, in other places — it’s common for teachers’ unions to spend big.

That’s what happened this time in Indianapolis.

Critics of the current administration made their first organized bid to unseat incumbent board members in 2016 when they formed the group OurIPS. The group didn’t donate to candidates, but the district-wide candidate the group supported, Jim Grim, did win a $15,000 contribution from the Indiana State Teachers Association.

Despite that cash, all four candidates backed by OurIPS lost on Election Day.

The contribution to Grim’s campaign was revealed in final campaign finance reports due to the Marion County Election Board last week. The disclosures detail fundraising and spending for each school board campaign, but they don’t include groups such as Stand for Children, which sends mailers and hires campaign workers to support the candidates it endorses but is not required to disclose all of its political activity.

Although the union donation was easily the largest single contribution any candidate received, other candidates did raise more in total. The Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce spent more overall but gave to four candidates.

Here are the totals for each race:


Grim raised $20,930 during the election. His opponents were incumbent Sam Odle, who raised $31,893, and challenger Elizabeth Gore, who won a surprise victory in the raise. Gore has not filed a finance report, but she told Chalkbeat after the election that she raised about $1,200.

District 1

Incumbent Michael O’Connor vastly out fundraised his opponent in the race, raising $23,543, according to his disclosure. Challenger Christine Prince raised $100.

District 2

Venita Moore, a newcomer who won the seat with support from Stand for Children, raised $25,712. Ramon Batts, who had the support of OurIPS, raised $3,550. Nanci Lacy did not file a report.

District 4

Long-time board member Diane Arnold raised $16,696. Challenger Larry Vaughn did not file a report.

Correction: This post has been updated to reflect a new fundraising total for Michael O’Connor, who submitted a corrected disclosure.

day one

Three new members join IPS board, Sullivan elected president

PHOTO: Dylan Peers McCoy
Five IPS board members were sworn in. Left to right: Elizabeth Gore, Dorene Rodriguez Hoops, Diane Arnold, Venita Moore and Michael O'Connor.

Mary Ann Sullivan will lead the Indianapolis Public School board for the second year in a row, bringing a dose of consistency to a board that begins the term with three new members.

At the first meeting of 2017, the seven-member board swore in three new members, Dorene Rodriguez Hoops, Elizabeth Gore and Venita Moore, and two returning members, Diane Arnold and Michael O’Connor. In a clear sign of the growing collaboration between the city — which oversees dozens of charter schools — and the school district, the members were sworn in by Indianapolis Mayor Joe Hogsett.

“The decisions you make here profoundly impact not only the students that attend IPS today but … the future of this great city,” Hogsett said. “As our city strives to always better our schools, your individual rules in that effort are critically important to the long-term health and well-being of this city.”

The new board unanimously elected Sullivan as president, O’Connor as vice-president and Gore as secretary. Sullivan, who was also president in 2016, joined the board two years ago as part of a wave of members who support dramatic changes aimed at improving the lowest performing schools.

“I will do my best to maintain the progress that we are making on so many fronts and to keep our sense of urgency,” Sullivan said. “I am very, very confident that this board is ready to provide the leadership needed to transform lives.”

Two of the new board members won spots following a bruising election fight for control of the board between advocates for radically overhauling the district by embracing policies such as partnerships with charter schools and critics who favor more traditional management. The third new member was chosen by the board to replace LaNier Echols, who resigned following the election.

The three newest board members bring a wide range of experience to the board. Here’s a little about each:

Dorene Rodriguez Hoops is the most mysterious new board member because she was chosen by the board to fill a vacancy, rather than going through the election process. She represents District 5, which covers the northwest section of IPS. Although her positions on many of the biggest issues facing the district are not clearly fleshed out, her personal background gives her a unique perspective on many of the issues facing IPS families. A first-generation Mexican American and fluent Spanish speaker, Hoops is the only Latina board member. She also is the only current parent on the board, with a son enrolled at Center for Inquiry School 27. Her son has special needs, and she said her work advocating for his education renewed her commitment to ensuring educational access.

Elizabeth Gore defeated Sam Odle for an at-large seat representing the entire district. Although she is newly elected, this is not her first time on the board. Gore served a term on the board before losing a reelection bid in 2012, when a wave of critics of former-superintendent Eugene White captured control. In her bid for reelection, Gore was not backed by school-reform supporters or the organized opposition, and her victory was something of a surprise. She is a graduate of Crispus Attucks High School and her three children graduated from Arsenal Technical High School, where she led the parent teacher association.

Venita Moore won a three-way race to replace former board member Gayle Cosby, a frequent critic of the administration. She represents District 2, which covers the northeast section of IPS. A business consultant with experience running a state agency, Moore was endorsed by pro-reform groups including Stand for Children. But she does not have a significant record of political work on education, so her approach to the school board is still something of an unknown. Moore is also an IPS graduate, and her daughter graduated from Crispus Attucks High School.