The standards, which identify what students are expected to know at each grade level, will reach classrooms in the fall of 2018.
Their approval followed a year-long review that had more than 1,300 Tennesseans, mainly educators, weighing in online last fall during public comment.
While without fanfare, Friday’s unanimous vote received a positive reception, including this tweet by Latoya Pugh, science instructional manager for Shelby County Schools and a member of the standards review committee that vetted the standards.
New TN Science Standards are approved. We will be doing big things in 18-19 for science. Can’t wait! Thanks @LEncalade#TNScience
In a press release, Climate Parents, a national initiative to support climate change education, also lauded the standards for their attention to the environment.
The state’s current science standards received a “D” in 2012 from the Fordham Foundation, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank, which called them disordered, confusing and missing critical content in every science discipline.
Tennessee has undergone a flurry of activity in the last year to revise and update its academic standards, which are supposed to be reviewed and renewed by the State Board every six years. The science review happened with little pushback, unlike this year’s review of the state’s social studies standards and last year’s politically charged debate about Tennessee’s Common Core standards for math and English, which also have been revised.
meet the candidates
These candidates are running for Detroit school board. Watch them introduce themselves.
The Chicago Police Department doesn’t adequately screen and train the officers it assigns to Chicago Public Schools, and their roles in schools are poorly defined, according to a sharply critical report released today by the Office of Inspector General Joseph Ferguson.
The report lists a litany of failings, including basic administration: There is no current agreement between the police department and the district governing the deployment of school resource officers, or SROs, and neither the schools nor the police even have a current list of the officers working in schools this year.
The inspector general’s report also mentions several sets of SRO resources and best practices created and endorsed by the federal government, then notes that Chicago hasn’t adopted any of them. “CPD’s current lack of guidance and structure for SROs amplifies community concerns and underscores the high probability that students are unnecessarily becoming involved in the criminal justice system, despite the availability of alternate solutions,” says the report.
Chalkbeat reported in August about incidents in which SROs used batons and tasers on students while intervening in routine disciplinary matters.
Scrutiny of SROs is nothing new, and is part of the broader CPD consent decree brokered this week between Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan. That agreement calls for better training and vetting of SROs, as well as a clearer delineation of their roles on campuses—including a prohibition against participating in routine school discipline — beginning with the 2019-20 school year.
But the report from Ferguson’s office says that the consent decree doesn’t go far enough. It chastises police for not pledging to include the community in the creation of its agreement with the school district, nor in the establishment of hiring guidelines; and for not creating a plan for evaluating SROs’ performance, among other recommendations. In addition, the report criticizes the police department for delaying the reforms until the 2019-20 school year. A draft of the inspector general’s report was given to the police department in early August in hopes that some of the issues could be resolved in time for the school year that began last week. The police department asked for an extension for its reply.