Who Is In Charge

Party divisions shown in committee votes

Two of the session’s higher profile education bills, on resident tuition for undocumented students and on charter school facilities, were set up Friday for initial floor consideration.

Colorado CapitolBoth measures passed from committee on party-line votes, perhaps prefiguring divisions during floor debate and problems if and when each measure moves to the second house.

Senate Bill 11-126, the undocumented tuition bill, passed the Senate Appropriations Committee on a 5-4 vote, with Democrats in the majority.

Sen. Keith King, R-Colorado Springs, went 0 for 2 in his effort to remove the word “unsubsidized” from the bill. Supporters used that word because such undocumented students wouldn’t be eligible for College Opportunity Fund stipends, a tuition discount device. King argues students would be at least indirectly subsidized through another type of state aid to colleges. The amendment was defeated earlier this week in another committee and again Friday in Appropriations.

Majority Republicans prevailed in the 7-6 vote to pass House Bill 11-1055 out of the House Appropriations Committee.

The measure would allow charter schools to request use of vacant district buildings and if refused appeal to the Department of Education. It would create the same process for Charter School Institute schools that want to use state buildings.

The bill was amended earlier in the house Education Committee to remove provisions that would have given charters the same access to vacant district or state land.

Rep. Mark Ferrandino, D-Denver, questioned whether the state portion of the bill would give CDE unconstitutional power over other state agencies and also improperly interfere with the legislature’s budgeting authority. (Those issues didn’t come up in Education Committee debate.)

Appropriations Chair Rep. Cheri Gerou, R-Evergreen, voted for the bill but told sponsor Rep. Don Beezley, R-Broomfield, she has concerns. “We can talk more about this on the floor.”


Aurora’s superintendent will get a contract extension

Aurora Public Schools Superintendent Rico Munn. (Photo by Andy Cross/The Denver Post)

The Aurora school board is offering superintendent Rico Munn a contract extension.

Marques Ivey, the school board president, made the announcement during Tuesday’s regular board meeting.

“The board of education believes we are headed in the right direction,” Ivey said. Munn can keep the district going in the right direction, he added.

The contract extension has not been approved yet. Munn said Tuesday night that it had been sent to his lawyer, but he had not had time to review it.

Munn took the leadership position in Aurora Public Schools in 2013. His current contract is set to expire at the end of June.

Munn indicated he intends to sign the new contract after he has time to review it. If he does so, district leaders expect the contract to be on the agenda of the board’s next meeting, April 3, for a first review, and then for a vote at the following meeting.

Details about the new offer, including the length of the extension or any salary increases, have not been made public.

Four of the seven members currently on the board were elected in November as part of a union-supported slate. Many voiced disapproval of some of the superintendent’s reform strategies such as his invitation to charter school network DSST to open in Aurora.

In their first major vote as a new board, the board also voted against the superintendent’s recommendation for the turnaround of an elementary school, signaling a disagreement with the district’s turnaround strategies.

But while several Aurora schools remain low performing, last year the district earned a high enough rating from the state to avoid a path toward state action.

cooling off

New York City charter leader Eva Moskowitz says Betsy DeVos is not ‘ready for prime time’

PHOTO: Chalkbeat
Success Academy CEO and founder Eva Moskowitz seemed to be cooling her support for U.S. Education Secretary Betsy DeVos.

In New York City, Eva Moskowitz has been a lone voice of support for the controversial U.S. Education Secretary Betsy DeVos. But even Moskowitz appears to be cooling on the secretary following an embarrassing interview.

“I believe her heart is in the right place,” Moskowitz, founder and CEO of Success Academy, said of DeVos at an unrelated press conference. “But as the recent interviews indicate, I don’t believe she’s ready for primetime in terms of answering all of the complex questions that need to be answered on the topic of public education and choice.”

That is an apparent reference to DeVos’s roundly criticized appearance on 60 Minutes, which recently aired a 30-minute segment in which the secretary admits she hasn’t visited struggling schools in her tenure. Even advocates of school choice, DeVos’s signature issue, called her performance an “embarrassment,” and “Saturday Night Live” poked fun at her.  

Moskowitz’s comments are an about-face from when the education secretary was first appointed. While the rest of the New York City charter school community was mostly quiet after DeVos was tapped for the position, Moskowitz was the exception, tweeting that she was “thrilled.” She doubled-down on her support months later in an interview with Chalkbeat.

“I believe that education reform has to be a bipartisan issue,” she said.

During Monday’s press conference, which Success Academy officials called to push the city for more space for its growing network, Moskowitz also denied rumors, fueled by a tweet from AFT President Randi Weingarten, that Success officials had recently met with members of the Trump administration.

Shortly after the election, Moskowitz met with Trump amid speculation she was being considered for the education secretary position. This time around, she said it was “untrue” that any visits had taken place.

“You all know that a while back, I was asked to meet with the president-elect. I thought it was important to take his call,” she said. “I was troubled at the time by the Trump administration. I’m even more troubled now. And so, there has been no such meeting.”