Future of Teaching

Indiana school districts receive grants to train math and science teachers

The Indiana Department of Education awarded grants to four Marion County school districts for professional development for math and science teachers.

Indiana distributed seventeen Math and Science Partnership (MSP) grants in total to districts across the state. Grant recipients will work with universities, foundations, and other local institutions to develop projects to help math and science educators improve their teaching strategies and knowledge. Past projects have involved teacher workshops, summer institutes, field trips, and pairing teachers with mentors who work in science fields.

“Focusing on STEM is vital to the future success of not only our students, but also our state,” state superintendent Jennifer McCormick said in a statement today. “I applaud the efforts these schools have shown in this area and congratulate them on receiving this grant.” STEM education refers to integrated science, technology, engineering, and math programs.

Expanding teacher development opportunities is a big goal for districts like Indianapolis Public Schools, and could help schools hold on to their teachers longer.

Under the MSP program, Indiana receives federal dollars according to its student population and poverty rates, and distributes them to selected districts with above average rates of low-income students and below average test scores in math and science. This year’s recipients were part of the program for the past one or two years. Some districts received multiple grants.

Here are the recipients and their university partners:

  • Indianapolis Public Schools, University of Notre Dame: $80,000
  • Metropolitan School District of Wayne Township, University of Southern Indiana Warsaw Community Schools, Ball State University: $180,000
  • MSD of Pike Township, Butler University: $135,000
  • MSD of Washington Township, Ball State University: $84,000
  • Elkhart Community Schools, Purdue University Calumet: $180,000
  • Evansville Vanderburgh Schools, University of Notre Dame: $125,000
  • Evansville Vanderburgh Schools, Community Schools of Frankfort, South Vermillion Community School Corporation, $210,000
  • Evansville Vanderburgh Schools, University of Southern Indiana, Butler University: $220,000
  • Fairfield Community Schools, Goshen Community Schools, Purdue University: $154,652
  • Greencastle Community Schools, DePauw University: $83,228
  • Loogootee Community Schools, Barr Reeve Community Schools, North Daviess Community Schools, Shoals Community Schools, Washington Community Schools, Washington Catholic Schools, Indiana University: $135,000
  • Michigan City Area Schools, LaPorte Community Schools, North Judson Schools, MSD of New Dunham Township, Purdue University North Central: $200,000
  • Purdue University Calumet, Griffith Public Schools, School City of Hammond, Hammond Academy of Science and Technology, and Merrillville Community Schools: $80,271
  • South Bend Community Schools, Indiana University South Bend: $135,000
  • Spencer Owen Community Schools, Richland-Bean Blossom Community Schools, Indiana University: $200,000
  • Vigo County Schools, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Indiana State University: $150,000 and $140,000.

teacher prep

Tennessee’s mediocre teacher training programs prompt ‘interventions’ with university presidents

PHOTO: Austin Peay
Austin Peay State University in Clarksville is among four Tennessee schools that have undergone "interventions" with state officials over the quality of their teacher training programs.

Armed with sobering data about the performance of teacher training programs in Tennessee, state officials are holding meetings with top brass at universities where they say programs have grown out of touch with the needs of K-12 classrooms.

About 40 programs in Tennessee feed the state’s teacher pipeline with about 4,000 new teachers annually. The largest are based at colleges and universities.

But those same traditional programs generally aren’t attracting enough high-quality candidates or producing enough effective or diverse teachers. Not a single public university in Tennessee scored in the top fifth of teacher training programs under a state report card issued in 2016. And the outlook isn’t expected to improve much under the 2017 report card being released early next month, officials say.

“This data is sobering. It tells us that higher education must do better,” said Mike Krause, executive director of the Tennessee Higher Education Commission. “I worry our higher education faculty in colleges of education get disconnected from what a K-12 classroom looks like.”

Krause outlined the challenges to state lawmakers during a presentation on Tuesday with Sara Heyburn Morrison, executive director of the Tennessee State Board of Education.

Their first “intervention meetings” were with the presidents and education deans at four universities: Austin Peay, Tennessee-Chattanooga, Tennessee-Martin, and Tennessee Tech. Similar meetings are scheduled this spring with leadership of private colleges and universities across the state.

Krause described the first meetings as “very productive” — and illuminating. “In many cases, the presidents just didn’t know” about their programs’ shortcomings, he said.

Teacher quality is considered a driving factor in students’ success, making the quality of teacher preparation programs a front-burner issue in Tennessee.  A 2016 report said only a handful of the state’s programs are consistently preparing teachers to improve student achievement based on Tennessee’s TVAAS measure. The State Board’s new grading system also highlighted weaknesses based on racial diversity, candidates’ ACT scores, and whether they are producing teachers for high-need areas such as special education.

Reading instruction is another big challenge. In a state where only a third of students are considered proficient in reading, new teachers are arriving in classrooms ill-prepared to instruct students on Tennessee’s new reading standards. The state is working with higher education institutions so their faculty can take the same professional development on literacy that working teachers are taking.

But for the most part, the State Board has limited levers for improving the quality of teacher prep. The biggest hammer comes every seven years when each program undergoes a comprehensive review for licensure. (In 2014, the state raised its standards and revised its measures for effectiveness to include data such as placement, retention and employer satisfaction.)

Chancellor Keith Carver

Tennessee-Martin Chancellor Keith Carver said his school took its last state report card to heart. As a result of its overall score of 2 out of a possible 4, the university hired an assessment coordinator to help guide decisions based on data. “It’s a really good baseline for improving,” he said of the report card. “We’ve got some work to do in our diversity profile.”

Tennessee’s teacher candidates are overwhelmingly white and female. Of those who completed Tennessee’s programs in 2016, only 14 percent identified themselves as non-white, compared with 36 percent of the state’s student population.

“Colleges of education will not stumble into diversity. There has to be a very intentional effort,” Krause said.

View the full presentation from Tuesday’s legislative hearing below.

Gold standard teachers

Tennessee adds nationally certified teachers but continues to trail in the South

PHOTO: Ruma Kumar/Chalkbeat

Twenty Tennessee educators have earned a national certification that’s considered the profession’s highest mark of achievement, although the state continues to lag in the South in growing that community.

The state Department of Education on Tuesday released the list of new educators designated as National Board Certified Teachers.

Their addition brings Tennessee’s number of NBCT educators to more than 700, with another 63 pursuing certification. By comparison, Kentucky has 3,600, Virginia 3,400, and Georgia 2,600.

“We know that teachers are the biggest factor in the success of our students, and it is an honor to celebrate educators who are helping their students grow, while serving as an example of what it means to be a lifelong learner,” Commissioner Candice McQueen said in a statement.

Nationally, 5,470 teachers earned the designation in 2016-17, raising the total to more than 118,000 through the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. The certification takes from one to three years to complete and includes a performance-based peer-review process. Successful candidates must demonstrate a proven impact on student learning and achievement.

In Tennessee, at least 36 school districts offer at least one type of incentive for achieving the certification. The most common is a salary bonus.

North Carolina continues to lead the nation in certification, with 616 more teachers gaining the endorsement last month from the Arlington, Va.-based organization.

Earning their certification in Tennessee were:

  • John Bourn, Franklin Special School District
  • Christy Brawner, Shelby County Schools
  • James Campbell, Metro Nashville Public Schools
  • Kimberly Coyle, Sumner County Schools
  • Suzanne Edwards, Williamson County Schools
  • Anastasia Fredericksen, Metro Nashville Public Schools
  • Theresa Fuller, Kingsport City Schools
  • Amber Hartzler, Clarksville-Montgomery County School System
  • Jennifer Helm, Williamson County Schools
  • Deborah Higdon, Franklin Special School District
  • Karen Hummer, Franklin Special School District
  • Heather Meston, Metro Nashville Public Schools
  • Melissa Miller, Franklin Special School District
  • Kelsey Peace, Sumner County Schools
  • Lindsey Pellegrin, Franklin Special School District
  • Andrea Reeder, Williamson County Schools
  • Jordan Sims, Metro Nashville Public Schools
  • Susanna Singleton, Williamson County Schools
  • Melissa Stugart, Metro Nashville Public Schools
  • Drew Wilkerson, Franklin Special School District

To learn more, visit the website of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards.