test scores

New York City reading scores leap, matching state average for first time

PHOTO: Creative Commons/timlewisnm

The share of New York City students who passed the state English exams jumped by nearly 8 points this year to 38 percent, matching the state average for the first time, state officials said Friday. That spike beat the statewide increase by one point, and is four times greater than the city’s year-over-year increase in 2015.

City students also made smaller gains in math: 36.4 percent passed the exams in 2016, a roughly one point increase from the previous year. Statewide, about 39 percent of students passed that exam, according to state figures released Friday afternoon.

“These results represent important progress and outline real improvements across each borough of our city,” Mayor Bill de Blasio said in a statement. “We congratulate our students, families and devoted educators for this critical step forward.”

Meanwhile, 21 percent of students across the state refused to take the tests, which was about the same as in 2015, state officials said. The city’s opt-out rate, while far lower than the state’s, grew significantly in 2016. This year, 2.4 percent of city students sat out the English exams — a 71 percent jump over 2015. And 2.76 percent opted out of math, a 53 percent surge.

The statewide opt-out rate remained constant despite efforts by state officials to restore faith in the tests by making a series of adjustments. But leaders of the test boycott insisted that those changes did not go far enough and, on Friday, they said this year’s numbers indicate that movement remains strong.

“I think what it says is that parents are still extremely angry and extremely upset about assessments,” said Lisa Rudley, a parent and founder of New York State Allies for Public Education, which promotes opting out. “I just think it’s another indication that this is not going away in New York.”

State Education Commissioner MaryEllen Elia cautioned on Friday that this year’s scores were not exactly comparable to previous years because of recent policy changes, such as giving students unlimited time this year to take the tests and reducing the number of questions. She said those adjustments, combined with students’ higher skills, might explain this year’s unusually large increase in students passing the tests. However, she insisted that the tests did not become less difficult, and that they were vetted for “reliability, rigorousness and validity.”

Elia also attributed New York City’s improvements to efforts by the city education department.

“There’s been some pretty intensive teacher training in the schools across New York City,” she said, “and I know that specifically there’s been an agenda to increase writing across city schools.”

All racial groups in New York City did better on the English tests this year, meaning that the so-called achievement gap between races mostly stayed the same. Black and white students saw their pass rates increase by 7.6 percentage points, while Hispanic students made a 7.4 point gain.

Non-native English speakers, who typically score far below their peers, did not gain ground this year. Just 4.4 percent of English learners passed the English exams — the same share as in 2015 — while 13 percent passed math, a modest decrease from last year. Those rates were slightly higher than the state averages.

Students with disabilities, who also usually score well below average, saw an uptick in English pass rates to just over 9 percent, up from nearly 7 percent last year. Math scores stayed essentially flat at 11.4 percent. Those rates were just above the state’s averages.

At least some of the city’s improvement on the English tests was driven by a dramatic spike in charter school scores. The city’s charter schools posted a nearly 14 point increase, jumping from 29 to 43 percent of students passing. In math, the charter schools also outperformed district schools, with a 4.5 point increase from 44 to nearly 49 percent. Charter schools enroll about 95,000 students, or roughly 8.6 percent of students citywide.

The New Chancellor

Tell us: What should the new chancellor, Richard Carranza, know about New York City schools?

PHOTO: Christina Veiga
A student at P.S. 69 Journey Prep in the Bronx paints a picture. The school uses a Reggio Emilia approach and is in the city's Showcase Schools program.

In a few short weeks, Richard Carranza will take over the nation’s largest school system as chancellor of New York City’s public schools.

Carranza, who has never before worked east of the Mississippi, will have to get up to speed quickly on a new city with unfamiliar challenges. The best people to guide him in this endeavor: New Yorkers who understand the city in its complexity.

So we want to hear from you: What does Carranza need to know about the city, its schools, and you to help him as he gets started April 2. Please fill out the survey below; we’ll collect your responses and share them with our readers and Carranza himself.

The deadline is March 23.

buses or bust?

Mayor Duggan says bus plan encourages cooperation. Detroit school board committee wants more details.

PHOTO: Denver Post file
Fourth-graders Kintan Surghani, left, and Rachel Anderson laugh out the school bus window at Mitchell Elementary School in Golden.

Detroit’s school superintendent is asking for more information about the mayor’s initiative to create a joint bus route for charter and district students after realizing the costs could be higher than the district anticipated.

District Superintendent Nikolai Vitti told a school board subcommittee Friday that he thought the original cost to the district was estimated to be around $25,000 total. Instead, he said it could cost the district roughly between $75,000 and a maximum of $125,000 for their five schools on the loop.

“I think there was a misunderstanding….” Vitti said. “I think this needs a deeper review…The understanding was that it would be $25,000 for all schools. Now, there are ongoing conversations about it being $15,000 to $25,000 for each individual school.”

The bus loop connecting charter and district schools was announced earlier this month by Mayor Mike Duggan as a way to draw kids back from the suburbs.

Duggan’s bus loop proposal is based on one that operates in Denver that would travel a circuit in certain neighborhoods, picking up students on designated street corners and dropping them off at both district and charter schools.

The bus routes — which Duggan said would be funded by philanthropy, the schools and the city — could even service afterschool programs that the schools on the bus route could work together to create.

In concept, the finance committee was not opposed to the idea. But despite two-thirds of the cost being covered and splitting the remaining third with charters, they were worried enough about the increased costs that they voted not to recommend approval of the agreement to the full board.  

Vitti said when he saw the draft plan, the higher price made him question whether the loop would be worth it.

“If it was $25,000, it would be an easier decision,” he said.

To better understand the costs and benefits and to ultimately decide, Vitti said he needs more data, which will take a few weeks. 

Alexis Wiley, Duggan’s chief of staff, said the district’s hesitation was a sign they were performing their due diligence before agreeing to the plan.

“I’m not at all deterred by this,” Wiley said. She said the district, charters, and city officials have met twice, and are “working in the same direction, so that we eliminate as many barriers as we can.”

Duggan told a crowd earlier this month at the State of the City address that the bus loop was an effort to grab the city’s children – some 32,500 – back from suburban schools.

Transportation is often cited as one of the reasons children leave the city’s schools and go to other districts, and charter leaders have said they support the bus loop because they believe it will make it easier for students to attend their schools.

But some board members had doubts that the bus loop would be enough to bring those kids back, and were concerned about giving charters an advantage in their competition against the district to increase enrollment.

“I don’t know if transportation would be why these parents send their kids outside of the district,” Angelique Peterson-Mayberry said. “If we could find out some of the reasons why, it would add to the validity” of implementing the bus loop.

Board member LaMar Lemmons echoed other members’ concerns on the impact of the transportation plan, and said many parents left the district because of the poor quality of schools under emergency management, not transportation.

“All those years in emergency management, that drove parents to seek alternatives, as well as charters,” he said. “I’m hesitant to form an unholy alliance with the charters for something like this.”