scanning shifts

Only one school campus has asked to have metal detectors added or removed since New York City created guidelines for requesting changes

PHOTO: Christina Veiga
A member of the New York Police Department visits a classroom at Queens Explorers Elementary School.

More than a year after New York City created a formal procedure for principals to ask for metal detectors to be added or removed from their buildings, almost none have.

Since the guidelines were established in July 2016, just one school campus has asked for a change in how often existing scanners are used in their building, according to officials, who said the request was approved. None have asked for new scanners to be added, they said.

Critics say principals may find the procedure too cumbersome — it involves consulting a long list of school stakeholders before submitting a written request — or they may worry about being blamed if violence breaks out after they ask to get rid of scanners. Others may be content with their metal detectors, or they may not know how to request changes under the new guidelines.

“I just don’t really feel like schools and communities are clear or have been notified — or that there have been actual, clear conversations with them around the new procedure,” said Kesi Foster, an organizer with Urban Youth Collaborative, a student-led social justice organization that has pushed for the removal of metal detectors.

Across the city, 91 school buildings have metal detectors, according to the education department. (Only middle and high schools use scanners; when elementary schools are housed in buildings with metal detectors they use separate entrances.)

The total includes the Urban Assembly School for Wildlife Conservation, the Bronx high school where a student fatally stabbed a classmate in September. The city installed metal detectors at the school after the attack.

In 2015, a school-safety task force convened by Mayor Bill de Blasio said that even as school crime dropped by 48 percent over the previous decade, not a single permanent metal detector had been removed from a school. The report also noted that no formal guidelines existed for adding or removing scanners.

The following year, the education and police departments established such guidelines.

They say that principals who are interested in installing or removing metal detectors — or changing how many days per week existing scanners are used — must first consult a range of stakeholders. Those stakeholders include: members of the school safety committee and leadership team, the school’s union representative, teachers, students, parents, safety agents, and the local superintendent.

If all the groups agree to a change, then the principal must submit a written request. The police and education departments will then review the school’s safety data, conduct a “scanning assessment,” and meet with the principal and superintendent before deciding whether to grant the request.

Some critics say the policy makes requesting changes too difficult.

Jill Bloomberg, principal of Park Slope Collegiate in Brooklyn, has called for the city to remove metal detectors from her building. But she shares a campus with three other schools — and not all the principals feel the same as her, she said.

“The default goes to the principal who wants to keep the metal detectors,” she said.

An education department spokeswoman said principals in shared buildings do not have to come to unanimous decisions about metal detectors. However, the guidelines say principals in the same building must discuss any proposed changes, and that the decision to request changes should be made “collectively.”

The spokeswoman also said that principals were informed of the new guidelines in the education department’s weekly email address to school leaders. They were also invited to attend training sessions to learn about the policy, though the spokeswoman could not say how many school leaders actually attended.

It’s possible some principals have asked for changes without submitting a formal request.

At a recent city council hearing, Councilman Rafael Salamanca of the Bronx said the former principal of Urban Assembly School for Wildlife Conservation — the site of September’s classroom stabbing — had previously asked for metal detectors to be installed in the building. Education department officials said no formal request had been made.

“The events in my district demonstrate the process needs reformed,” Salamanca said in an emailed statement, referring to the process for requesting that metal detectors be added or removed.

Even when schools do not request changes, the police and education departments say they conduct an annual data review of every school with metal detectors to determine whether they are still needed.

Since 2016, the city has changed how often two schools use metal detectors. And three buildings — including the Bronx high school — have started using metal detectors.

While some principals may be unaware of the process for removing metal detectors or worried about the risks, others may want to keep theirs in place.

Evan Schwartz, principal of Alfred E. Smith Career and Technical Education High School in the Bronx, said he has worked in schools with metal detectors for most of his career. In his current building, which multiple schools share, more than 1,000 students stream through metal detectors every morning in a process he described as quick and orderly.

When another principal in the building suggested getting rid of the scanners a few years ago, Schwartz objected.

“It makes it safer for everybody,” he said.

Walk it out

NYC mayor encourages school walkouts in wake of Florida shooting: ‘If I was a high school student today, I’d be walking out’

PHOTO: Michael Appleton/Mayoral Photography Office
Mayor Bill de Blasio

In the wake of a school shooting in Florida that left 17 dead, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio said students won’t face serious disciplinary action if they choose to participate in a national school walkout planned for next month to protest gun violence.

“If I was a high school student today, I’d be walking out,” de Blasio said Thursday. “This is too important a moment in history to try to hold back the desire of our young people to see fundamental change and to protect themselves.”

Students across the country are planning to walk out of class at 10 a.m. on March 14 “to protest Congress’ inaction to do more than tweet thoughts and prayers in response to the gun violence plaguing our schools and neighborhoods,” according to a Facebook description of the event.  The protest is scheduled to last 17 minutes, one for each person who died at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.

And unlike one Texas school district, which threatened to slap students with suspensions if they walked out, de Blasio said students would not face serious discipline. “There’s no negative, lasting impact if they do this,” the mayor said.

De Blasio’s tacit endorsement of the walkout comes just days after he announced that schools across the city would deploy more “rapid-response lesson plans” about current events. On Friday, de Blasio told WNYC’s Brian Lehrer that the protests are a “teachable moment.”

We are going to do lesson plans around this issue leading up to that day,” de Blasio said. “We are going to make sure that there’s a real educational impact.”

The city also announced this week that every New York City school will hold a lockdown drill by March 15, and every middle and high school will be subject to at least one random screening with metal detectors this year.

Here’s more on what de Blasio told Lehrer this morning:

For high school students – we are going to be very clear, we want parents to weigh in, to let us know if they are comfortable with a young person walking out. It is supposed to be for 17 minutes. We expect the school day before and after to proceed. For younger folks – middle school, elementary school — the model I’m interested in, we are still working on this, is to have it be within the context of the building, you know to gather in the building for the memorial to the 17 young people lost, 17 people lost I should say. And again that may be silent, that may be with young people speaking, that’s all being worked through.

Speaking Out

Students at Denver’s George Washington High say their voices were unheard in principal selection

PHOTO: Denver Post file

When Shahad Mohieldin learned that students, parents, and teachers at George Washington High School in Denver would have a say in who was named the next principal, the high school senior spent days recruiting representatives from all three groups to participate.

Mohieldin, a member of the school’s advisory board, said she and others worked hard to ensure the group vetting the principal candidates would be diverse. It was important to include students of color and white students, parents who speak English and those who don’t, and teachers of both International Baccalaureate and traditional classes, she said, especially since the high school has been working to heal years-long racial and academic divides.

The students particularly liked one candidate who they said seemed to understand the school’s struggles. He would have also been a leader of color at a school where 70 percent are students of color. Denver Public Schools Superintendent Tom Boasberg ultimately chose a different candidate, a more experienced principal with whom he’d worked closely before.

It was a whirlwind process that took just seven weeks from when the current principal announced his retirement. In the end, Mohieldin and other students said they were left feeling like their voices were ignored.

“We were often told that, ‘Hey, your voice really matters in this. Please, we want your input,’” Mohieldin said. “It really hurts. Now we don’t trust the district as much, which is really sad.”

District leaders said the process was quick but thorough. Deputy Superintendent Susana Cordova said that while it was clear the students preferred one candidate, the input collected from parents, teachers, and community members was more mixed. The slate of three finalists was unusually strong, she said, and it was not an easy decision.

Kristin Waters, the candidate who was hired, is a former district administrator with years of experience leading a comprehensive Denver high school similar in size to George Washington. The students’ top choice was an assistant principal at East High School named Jason Maclin.

Cordova said she wants to assure students that although district leaders didn’t choose students’ favored candidate, they did consider their opinions.

“It is important to use your voice,” Cordova said. “Sometimes your voice isn’t the only piece of information we look at, but in no way does that mean to stop speaking out.”

Not listening to community feedback is a perennial criticism of Denver Public Schools, and one district leaders are continually trying to address. Recently, several major decisions have been based on recommendations from committees of parents and community members. While the process hasn’t always gone smoothly, the district has followed the community’s advice.

In the case of the George Washington principal selection, the process worked like this: Current principal Scott Lessard announced in mid-December that he’d be retiring at the end of the school year. Lessard has helmed the school for two years, and students and teachers credit him with fostering a sense of unity and a culture of openness to new ideas.

But he said the daily challenges of being a school principal led to his decision.

“I was going to retire at some point,” he said. “It may not have been at the end of this year, but it was going to be soon. The school in such a good place, I thought it was a unique opportunity now to find somebody who would be a good principal.”

The district has a pool of pre-screened principal candidates who are invited to apply for openings as they come up, Cordova said. With every vacancy, the district convenes a committee of parents, teachers, and community members to interview the candidates. In the case of high school principal jobs, the district also asks students to participate.

For George Washington, the district assembled the committee and three separate focus groups, which Mohieldin helped organize: one of parents, one of teachers, and one of students. The groups and the committee interviewed five candidates selected by the district, and based partly on their feedback, district leaders whittled the field to three finalists, Cordova said.

The three finalists then participated in a community forum. Forum attendees were asked to submit written comments on candidates’ strengths and weaknesses, and Cordova said she personally read every single one. She said district leaders also read emails students sent afterward urging the district to pick Maclin. Students said they never received responses to those emails – one reason they felt unheard.

A week after the forum, on Feb. 6, the district announced its decision to hire Waters.

Cordova said she has every confidence that Waters will be “an amazing school leader.” Waters has been principal of three Denver schools: Morey Middle School; Bruce Randolph School, which serves grades six through 12; and South High School, whose demographics are similar to George Washington. More than 300 of the 1,239 students at George Washington are black and more than 400 are Hispanic.

“She has a strong track record working in similar communities,” Cordova said.

Students had some concerns about Waters’ approachability and her seemingly close ties with district leadership; Boasberg was listed as the first reference on her resumé. They said they liked Maclin’s presence, and that he seemed knowledgeable about the school’s past struggles and had concrete ideas for its future. Maclin submitted a proposed plan for his first 100 days as principal that included conducting a listening tour of the school community.

But students said their main complaint is not the outcome but the way the process unfolded.

“The district goes through this whole act of putting on these focus groups and interviews at the school and it’s like, ‘What really came out of that?’” said sophomore Andrew Schwartz. “At this point, it seems like the answer to that question is very little. I think that’s upsetting.”

Schwartz was part of the student focus group that interviewed all five candidates. So was junior Henry Waldstreicher, who noted that students missed an entire day of school to participate.

Waldstreicher said he was also left feeling disillusioned. “Why should we even try to talk to the district if they’re not going to listen to what we’re going to say?” he said.

The perception that the selection process was top-down wasn’t just among the students. Some teachers and community members said they felt the same way.

“We were given the opportunity to give our feedback and then it went into a black box and a decision was made,” said Vincent Bowen, a community member who participates in a student mentoring program at George Washington and was on the selection committee.

Pam Shamburg, executive director of the Denver teachers union, shared those concerns, adding that what happened at George Washington has happened at other schools, too: Candidates, she said, “go through this process, this rigamarole, but the district already knows who they’re going to pick.”

Parent Elizabeth Sopher said she feels district leaders weren’t as transparent as they could have been about what they wanted in a new principal, which she suspects contributed to the disconnect between the students’ top pick and the district’s ultimate decision.

“When you say to a group, ‘You tell us what the most important thing about this new principal is to you,’” she said, but then don’t make a decision based on that, “that’s a mistake.”

For her part, Waters said she’s excited to step into her new role at George Washington. She’s slated to start March 1 and finish out the school year alongside Lessard, a transition plan Cordova said was important to the district and the school community.

Waters said she wants to build a strong relationship with students. To that end, she has already met with a group of them to talk about their concerns.

“Once I get on board, they will see me out and about and hopefully feel comfortable coming up to me and letting me know what they’re thinking,” Waters said. “I want their input.”

Junior Cora Galpern said rebuilding that trust will be crucial. In the future, Galpern said the district should give students and others more of a say in principal selection by seeking a consensus on a candidate rather than simply soliciting feedback.

“Because at the end of the day,” she said, “our next principal has a huge effect on our day-to-day lives.”