After-school programs in the U.S. are closing, but Michigan is finding a way to keep some afloat

A group of high school students practice a dance routine outside on a football field.
Students practice a dance routine at the Downtown Boxing Gym in Detroit. (Kelly Field for The Hechinger Report)

This story about after-school was produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and innovation in education. Sign up for the Hechinger newsletter.

CLEVELAND — In a public school cafeteria here, 6- and 7-year olds were taking turns sketching their ideas for a building made of toothpicks and gummy bears. Their task: to design a structure strong enough to support a single subject notebook.

It was a challenge meant to test their abilities to plan ahead, work as a team, and overcome setbacks. But first, they had to resist the urge to eat the building materials.

Zayden Barnes, a first grader at Clara E. Westropp School of the Arts, picked up a blue gummy bear and sniffed it. “That smells good,” he said, licking his lips.

Mia Navarro, another first grader, held a green gummy bear to her nose and inhaled deeply. “I can’t stop smelling them!” she exclaimed. “I just want to eat it, but I can’t!”

The lesson in engineering and self-control was part of an after-school program run by the nonprofit Horizon Education Centers. It’s one of a dwindling number of after-school options in this Rust Belt city.

Last year, Horizon and other nonprofit after-school providers reached more than 7,000 students in Cleveland public schools, buoyed by $17 million in pandemic recovery aid. But when the money ran out at the end of that school year, nonprofits here had to drop sites, shed staff, and shrink enrollment. Horizon, which was in five public schools last year, is now in just one.

Similar setbacks can be seen across the country, as after-school programs struggle to replace billions in federal relief money. A few states, including Michigan, are helping to fill the gap; the state legislature has provided $50 million in funding for after-school programs in Detroit and elsewhere in each of the last two years. Ohio, though, isn’t among those states. And many providers nationwide fear more cuts are coming, as the Trump administration continues its campaign to slash government spending and end “equity-related” grants and contracts.

The after-school sector plays a critical role in the nation’s economy, providing close to 8 million students, or nearly 14% of all school-aged children, with a safe place to go while their parents work. It offers homework help, enriching activities, healthy snacks and physical exercise — often for a fee but sometimes for free.

Related: A lot goes on in classrooms from kindergarten to high school. Keep up with our free weekly newsletter on K-12 education.

Done well, after-school programs can strengthen students’ social and emotional skills, increase their engagement with and attendance in school, and reduce their risk of substance abuse or criminal activity. In some cases, they can help improve grades and test scores, too.

Yet the sector, which has existed for more than 100 years, has long been hobbled by inadequate funding, staffing shortages, and uneven quality. There are long waitlists for many programs, and low-income families often struggle to find affordable options.

In a recent survey by the nonprofit Afterschool Alliance, more than 80% of program leaders said they were concerned about their program’s future, and more than 40% said they worried they’d have to close permanently.

“The state of after-school in America feels very grim,” said Alison Black, executive director of the Cleveland affiliate of America Scores, a nonprofit that teaches soccer and poetry to students in 13 cities across North America.

Nonprofits hit hard by loss of pandemic relief money

For a sector accustomed to scraping by, the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, or ARPA, was like a winning lottery ticket.

Over three years, after-school programs received roughly $10 billion in ARPA aid — money they used to add staff, improve pay and benefits, and expand enrollment, according to the Afterschool Alliance. It estimates that programs were able to serve 5 million more kids as a result.

But the money has mostly been spent, and late last month, Education Secretary Linda McMahon told districts that their time to use any remaining funds was over. In Cleveland, which spent almost $28 million on out-of-school time programs between fiscal 2022 and 2024, Horizon and other nonprofits formed a coalition to try to convince the district to continue at least a portion of the aid. They held rallies, secured media coverage, and brought parents to testify before the school board. But the district wouldn’t budge, said David Smith, Horizon’s executive director.

“There’s no opportunity to go back to the scale we were at during the pandemic, and we still have the same problems,” said Smith. “Kids are getting in trouble after school, and they still need the extra academic help.”

Related: $1.5 billion in recovery funds goes to afterschool

The Cleveland Metropolitan District’s CEO, Warren Morgan, has defended his decision not to fund the nonprofit providers, noting that the district offers after-school sports and an arts program. But those extracurriculars vary by day and by school, and after-school advocates say many schools have been left without the consistent, comprehensive care working parents depend on.

“Our city is focused on workforce development without thinking about who cutting this care hurts,” said Black, of America Scores Cleveland.

Without continued support from the district, Black’s organization has had to dip into its rainy-day fund and drop fall soccer for middle schoolers.

Other nonprofits have been harder hit. The Greater Cleveland Neighborhood Centers Association, or NCA, has closed half of its locations in the district, leaving programs in seven schools. The Boys and Girls Clubs of Northeast Ohio, which lost $3 million in pandemic relief dollars and other federal support this academic year, has shuttered 17 sites.

Dorothy Moulthrop, chief executive officer of Open Doors Academy, another nonprofit, thinks the losses might have been less severe if the after-school coalition had been able to show strong results for the federal money. Though individual programs handed over reams of data to the district, Moulthrop wasn’t able to get its leaders to share the data in a form that would allow providers to study their collective impact.

“We needed to be able to demonstrate our return on investment and we were not able to,” she said.

Mixed reviews on effectiveness of after-school programs

Questions about whether after-school programs are a good investment of public dollars have dogged the sector since the early 2000s. That’s when Mathematica Policy Research began publishing the results of an evaluation that found the 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program, the 27-year-old program that awards federal money for after-school programs via competitive grants through states, had little impact on student outcomes.

The study is controversial, with critics calling it methodologically flawed. But it remains among the only large-scale evaluations of after-school programs. Some analyses since have found after-school programs can boost reading and math achievement, promote positive social behaviors and reduce negative ones, but other studies have shown little growth in those and other areas.

Some of that inconsistency likely stems from differences in the quality of programs, researchers and advocates say. When funding is tight, after-school programs tend to focus their dollars on services, rather than professional development or program evaluation.

“Quality often feels like an extra,” said Jessie Kerr-Vanderslice, a consultant at the American Institutes for Research who focuses on out-of-school time programs.

Attendance matters too: Studies have found that students who attend regularly reap greater benefits than those who show up sporadically.

Yet more than half of students who participated in programs paid for with 21st Century grants in 2022-23 attended for less than 90 hours, a program evaluation shows. That works out to just 30 days for a three-hour program.

Detroit’s Downtown Boxing Gym keeps kids engaged

On the other side of Lake Erie, at Detroit’s Downtown Boxing Gym, students are required to attend at least three days a week. To keep them coming, the program offers a huge range of activities, from cooking to coding (but ironically, not boxing).

Inside the large building that houses the program, there’s a lab with a flight simulator and 3D printer, and a music studio paid for and built by one of Eminem’s former producers.

Outside, on a turf field where the program plans to build an addition that will enable it to double enrollment, a group of middle school majorettes is preparing for an upcoming dance performance.

Debra Beal, who became the caregiver to her niece’s two young sons when she was in her 50s, says the program saved her life — and theirs. It kept the boys, now 19 and 20, off the streets while she worked, provided them with exercise and tutoring, and even served them dinner. The staff became like family, supporting her when she struggled as a parent and offering to pay for counseling when one son lost his father and uncle from fentanyl overdoses on the same day.

“What they’re doing is life-changing,” said Beal, whose long denim coat had the word “Blessed” written in sequins on the back.

Financially, the Downtown Boxing Gym is on surer footing than its counterparts in Cleveland. The program recently received $3 million in funds from the state, a piece of Michigan’s $50 million allocation for after-school programs.

Related: ‘The kids everyone forgot’: Push to reengage young people not in school, college or the workforce falters

That doesn’t mean the program isn’t being pinched by the Trump administration’s cost-cutting campaign and purge of diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, said Jessica Hauser, its executive director. Corporations the program was counting on for seven-figure gifts for the addition and program expansion are reconsidering their pledges, and a promised federal earmark now seems unlikely.

Hauser is also worried about potential cuts to federal child nutrition programs and student aid, which the program depends on for meals and college student tutors.

Back in Cleveland, the coalition Smith formed to fight for after-school funding has expanded to include the city, the county, and a local foundation, which hired a consultant to come up with the cost to deliver quality after-school programming. To longtime advocates like Smith and Allison Wallace, executive director of the The Greater Cleveland Neighborhood Centers Association, or NCA, it feels like the sector is having to prove itself, yet again.

Things could get even tougher in the next couple years, as the district shifts the costs of providing security and custodial services for after-school programs onto the nonprofit providers. Wallace estimates that the change will cost providers tens of thousands per site.

And future federal funding is far from guaranteed. Though the 21st Century program enjoys bipartisan support in Congress, Trump sought to eliminate it in every budget proposal he issued in his first term and is expected to do so again.

For now, though, after-school programs are still providing kids in Cleveland with caring staff, a safe place to spend the hours after school, and engaging activities like gummy bear construction.

Related: After-school programs have either been abandoned or overworked

The teams had 10 minutes to build structures that could support a notebook. When the timer went off, the structure built by Zayden and Mia’s group resembled a two-story house with a caved-in roof. Zayden wasn’t feeling optimistic.

“I think it’s going to fall,” he said.

“Think positive,” said Kathy Thome, a program administrator who is helping the group.

Ian Welch, the program’s site coordinator for Clara E. Westropp, picked up a notebook and approached the table. He reminded the teams that failure is part of the scientific method. If their structures collapse, they can try again, he said.

“It’s going to squish down,” Mia predicted.

She was right. But the flattened structure still held the notebook aloft. The kids jumped up and down, and Zayden did a little boogie.

“We’re so happy — we did it!” he said.

Welch rewarded their effort with some fresh gummy bears, and the kids, proud and hopped up on sugar, waited for their parents to pick them up.

Contact editor Caroline Preston at 212-870-8965, on Signal at CarolineP.83 or via email at preston@hechingerreport.org.

This story was produced with support from the Education Writers Association Reporting Fellowship program.

The Latest

Federal investigation targets Chicago schools’ long-awaited Black Student Success Plan. State law mandated the Chicago Board of Education create a plan to “bring parity between Black children and their peers.”

Colorado ranks third in the nation, after Washington, D.C. and Vermont, for the share of 4-year-olds served in its state-funded preschool program.

Backers of a proposed religious charter school argue that charter schools are more private than public. The Supreme Court case could upend the charter sector, with implications for funding, autonomy and more.

The Illinois legislative session is scheduled to end on May 31. Lawmakers are considering several education bills and negotiating the fiscal year 2024 budget. Here is what Chalkbeat is following.

Advocates warn that transferring federal special education oversight to another department could weaken enforcement of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and other disability rights laws, while jeopardizing funding, research, and implementation.

Some districts invested pandemic relief money in instructional coaches and increased time spent on math. Test scores suggest that strategy’s paying off.