Philly school board to vote on search firm to help find new superintendent

Schools superintendent stands at podium with school board members and city officials near him.
At a press conference last month, Philadelphia Superintendent William Hite agreed with Mayor Jim Kenney, second from left, and Board of Education President Joyce Wilkerson, right, that it was time for him to move on. The board is now voting on a contract for a search firm. (Johann Calhoun / Chalkbeat)

Philadelphia’s Board of Education will vote Thursday on whether to approve a contract with a search firm to lead the effort to find a new district leader. 

Superintendent William Hite announced last month that he will step down next year.

The firm Isaacson, Miller, which is based in Boston but has an office in Center City, will be paid up to $190,000. The firm has led leadership searches for a variety of public and nonprofit organizations, including colleges, foundations, arts and cultural groups, and other public school districts. It also has worked for educational organizations on issues involving social justice and advocacy.
Six firms applied during a public RFP process, with proposals due last week. Isaacson, Miller scored the highest during a review, according to a school board representative.

In Philadelphia, Isaacson, Miller has led executive searches on behalf of Drexel University, the Philadelphia Museum of Art, the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Foundation, and Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts. It also most recently completed the CEO search for the Free Library of Philadelphia.

“During this public input process, we have continued to hear that the next superintendent needs to understand Philadelphia,” said Board Vice President Leticia Egea-Hinton in a press release Tuesday. “Following a rigorous review process, Isaacson, Miller emerged as a clear choice, both because of their exceptional reputation and their deep experience working with diverse institutions and communities across our city.”

Once the contract is authorized, the search firm will collect candidate resumes, list the job description, and vet potential candidates. In February, an advisory committee will interview the top five candidates.

The board has not said who will sit on the search advisory committee

Public forums with two finalists are expected by February or March, with a new leader hired in the spring. The new superintendent will likely start in August.

School board members promised last month to have a robust public process to choose a successor to Hite, who is leaving after nearly 10 years leading the district. Hite said he plans to support the transition until the end of his contract on Aug. 31. The public process started earlier this month, with a survey to allow the public to share what qualities they would like to see in the next superintendent.

In the last 16 days, the board has hosted or participated in 34 listening sessions, connected with 832 people, and received 1,002 completed surveys, according to the school board. Megan Smith of Brownstone Communications was hired to oversee the community engagement process. 

The board will review the feedback collected in the sessions and surveys, and evaluate it alongside the objectives of its accountability system known as “goals & guardrails.”

The Latest

Federal investigation targets Chicago schools’ long-awaited Black Student Success Plan. State law mandated the Chicago Board of Education create a plan to “bring parity between Black children and their peers.”

Colorado ranks third in the nation, after Washington, D.C. and Vermont, for the share of 4-year-olds served in its state-funded preschool program.

Backers of a proposed religious charter school argue that charter schools are more private than public. The Supreme Court case could upend the charter sector, with implications for funding, autonomy and more.

The Illinois legislative session is scheduled to end on May 31. Lawmakers are considering several education bills and negotiating the fiscal year 2024 budget. Here is what Chalkbeat is following.

Advocates warn that transferring federal special education oversight to another department could weaken enforcement of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and other disability rights laws, while jeopardizing funding, research, and implementation.

Some districts invested pandemic relief money in instructional coaches and increased time spent on math. Test scores suggest that strategy’s paying off.