Shelby County judge won’t immediately reinstate Marie Feagins as superintendent

A woman with short dark hair and wearing a light blue suit kneels next to a desk with a student between two rows of desks in a classroom.
Former Memphis superintendent Marie Feagins lost a legal bid to immediately return to her old job, but her lawsuit against the board that fired her is ongoing. (Ariel J. Cobbert for Chalkbeat)

Sign up for Chalkbeat Tennessee’s free newsletter to keep up with statewide education policy and Memphis-Shelby County Schools.

Former Memphis-Shelby County Schools Superintendent Marie Feagins will not immediately get her job back after a judge last week denied a request to reinstate her to the district’s top position.

Feagins had requested a preliminary injunction to reinstall her to the position in her ongoing lawsuit against the Memphis-Shelby County School Board, which voted 6-3 in January to fire her after less than a year on the job.

Though Feagins will not return to her position right away due to Shelby County Circuit Judge Robert Childers’ Friday ruling, her lawsuit against the school board is ongoing. And her ouster continues to bog down the district, as it spends resources on an external law firm to defend its actions in court while facing the serious prospect of a state takeover in the coming months.

In his ruling, Childers wrote that reinstating Feagins to her position at this stage in the case would cause “further disruption” to the school system at the start of the new school year.

Feagins has alleged multiple board members violated the Tennessee Open Meetings Act by secretly meeting last fall to orchestrate her ouster. The board members who voted to fire Feagins accused her of professional misconduct and poor leadership, though dozens of community members had urged the board to retain Feagins.

Feagins denied the accusations and filed her lawsuit in February. In addition to her reinstatement, Feagins is seeking nearly $500,000 in back pay and additional benefits.

“At stake here is not just Dr. Feagins,” the former superintendent’s attorney William Wooten said in July. “It’s the public’s right to open, lawful decision-making by elected officials. That right has been disregarded, trampled and violated.”

A judge last month allowed Feagins to amend her official complaint to include defamation claims against board member Towanna Murphy. Feagins alleged that Murphy spread “reckless and wild” rumors about her.

Murphy has declined to comment on the allegations.

Robert Spence, the lawyer representing the district, argued at a July hearing that board members are allowed to privately discuss the superintendent’s performance without running afoul of state law. Spence also criticized Feagins’ testimony as secondhand information, as Feagins frequently relayed conversations she did not participate in but heard about after the fact.

After objections, the judge rejected some of Feagins’ testimony, calling it “hearsay twice-removed.”

Additional hearings in the lawsuit have not yet been scheduled, according to the Shelby County Circuit Court docket.

Melissa Brown is the bureau chief for Chalkbeat Tennessee. Contact Melissa at mbrown@chalkbeat.org.

The Latest

For six years, city officials propped up school budgets despite steep enrollment declines. It’s now up to Mayor Zohran Mamdani to decide whether to keep the policy or wind it down.

The day ICE agents detained Liam Conejo Ramos was ‘sad and infuriating,’ his school district superintendent said. She’d hoped her students wouldn’t be targeted.

Indiana legislators are advancing a bill banning phones from schools and another to cut low-earning degrees at state universities.

The district’s school closure proposal includes shuttering five magnet or citywide admissions high schools.

Colorado lawmakers want to help prospective teachers who have run into legal trouble. A bill under consideration would only require licensure applicants to disclose misdemeanors that happened within the last seven years.

The end of Alma’s work no the search is the latest twist in a search process that began last spring and hasn’t yet produced a permanent CEO. Six elected board members are blaming the mayor’s office and its allies for ‘sabotaging’ the process.