Who’s running new virtual schools in Indiana? Lawmakers want to know.

One teenage boy works on a laptop at a table at home, while another sits on a sofa against windows in the background.
A new law would require districts that contract with outside virtual providers to submit the agreements to the Indiana Department of Education, giving officials notice of the partnerships, but no power. (Allison Shelley for American Education: Images of Teachers and Students in Action)

At a time when district-run virtual schools are growing at a breakneck pace, Indiana lawmakers are tired of being surprised by new programs. 

Now they are proposing a law that would require districts that contract with outside virtual providers to submit the agreements to the Indiana Department of Education, giving officials notice of the partnerships. Those contracts would reveal details such as the costs of the programs, the staff vendors will hire, and the expectations districts set for providers.

But the new rule, which was slipped into another education bill last week, would not give the department the authority to reject vendors or keep virtual programs from opening. 

“We just need to know what’s going on,” said Republican Sen. Jeff Raatz, the lawmaker behind the proposal. The guidelines are meant to ensure state officials know more about when districts launch virtual programs, he said. 

An earlier proposal from Raatz would have gone further. Under that version, districts would only have been allowed to contract with virtual education providers on a new state-approved list. The plan was changed because Raatz said he “didn’t want it to be punitive.”

The rapid growth of district-overseen virtual schools began with a tiny rural district. Enrollment tripled in Union Schools in 2018 after it contracted with a national virtual school provider to open a program that drew students from across the state. Because the district gets some of the state funding for the virtual students, the deal has helped keep it afloat.

Union now enrolls 6,000 students in its virtual schools, making it the second-largest online program in the state. That’s 20 times the enrollment in Union’s local schools, which have fewer than 300 students.

The proposal lawmakers are considering is unlikely to check the rapid growth of district virtual programs.

“Let’s face it, having to just hand your contract over to the state agency — that’s a meaningless requirement. It’s just a checkbox that you have to remember to do,” said Michael Barbour, a professor at Touro University in California, who is critical of Indiana for its lax oversight of virtual schools. 

When virtual schools began in Indiana, the largest operators were charter schools. But several of those schools have since closed. The state’s first online school was shuttered due to chronic poor performance. Two sister virtual schools closed amid scandal and were later accused of misspending more than $85 million in state funding

Lawmakers have tightened regulations on virtual charter schools in a bid to improve their quality. But in recent years, the largest new virtual programs are not independent charter schools. Instead, they are district programs, operated under contracts with outside companies, which are governed by different rules.  

While the state holds the local school systems responsible for student performance, the districts do not manage the daily operations of the online schools. 

This year, the number of Indiana students in virtual schools run by districts exceeded enrollment in virtual charter schools. Of the roughly 18,000 Indiana students in dedicated virtual schools, slightly over half are in district programs.  

In part, that was driven by new schools. The Clarksville school district opened a virtual school that enrolls more than 2,000 students. It is managed by Stride, formerly known as K12, the same for-profit company that works with Union. The Middlebury school district joined forces with a Utah-based company to offer a virtual program that caters to home-schoolers by offering flexibility and funding for educational materials.

The Latest

Federal investigation targets Chicago schools’ long-awaited Black Student Success Plan. State law mandated the Chicago Board of Education create a plan to “bring parity between Black children and their peers.”

Colorado ranks third in the nation, after Washington, D.C. and Vermont, for the share of 4-year-olds served in its state-funded preschool program.

Backers of a proposed religious charter school argue that charter schools are more private than public. The Supreme Court case could upend the charter sector, with implications for funding, autonomy and more.

The Illinois legislative session is scheduled to end on May 31. Lawmakers are considering several education bills and negotiating the fiscal year 2024 budget. Here is what Chalkbeat is following.

Advocates warn that transferring federal special education oversight to another department could weaken enforcement of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and other disability rights laws, while jeopardizing funding, research, and implementation.

Some districts invested pandemic relief money in instructional coaches and increased time spent on math. Test scores suggest that strategy’s paying off.