Jeffco to adopt new reading curriculum, push more uniform approach

The book “Two Friends” on a display stand on a shelf in an elementary school library
Jeffco district officials are planning to adopt a new elementary reading curriculum that will comply with state rules. (Laura Faith Kebede/Chalkbeat)

It’s almost budget season and for many Colorado school districts out of compliance with state rules on reading, that means it’s time to talk about purchasing new curriculum.

That’s what happened Thursday in Colorado’s second-largest school district, the 80,000-student Jeffco Public Schools. District leaders presented three options to replace the current mish-mash of programs used to teach elementary students how to read. 

While the district has not yet decided which of the three curriculums it might adopt, or whether to offer schools more than one choice, the shift to a districtwide approach represents a significant departure from the status quo. Currently, Jeffco schools use a number of different reading programs, including some the state has rejected because include discredited approaches to reading instruction. 

Jeffco isn’t the only district in this situation. Denver and Douglas County are two other large districts where reading curriculum varies widely from school to school. Some schools in all three districts use programs that don’t satisfy a 2019 state law requiring K-3 reading curriculum be backed by science. To comply with that law, the districts will have to make a good-faith effort to switch or they could face state sanctions. 

Jeffco is considering three reading programs, all of which have been approved by the state. They are Wonders 2020, Into Reading, and Benchmark Workshop.

The switch will be pricey, especially coming amid pandemic-era budget uncertainty. Jeffco officials said the cost of adopting a new reading curriculum will range from $8 million to $16 million depending on the program they choose. That’s about 1% to 2% of the district’s $806 million general fund budget. 

But board members expressed a willingness to spend that money, repeatedly saying reading instruction is at the core of what schools do. Most board members also said they’d allow some schools with specific niches — expeditionary learning, classical education, or dual language learning — to get “variances” to use reading curriculums other than what the district adopts. 

Board President Susan Harmon summarized the board’s philosophy, saying, “We’re looking to move everyone into a more uniform approach ... understanding there will be deviations. That is kind of a given in everything we do, but that is the exception.”

Board member Stephanie Schooley generally agreed with the purchase of a new program, but cautioned that a new reading curriculum alone won’t be a silver bullet for the districts’ mediocre reading achievement.

The district can’t just find “a [curricular] resource that we’re going to hang our hat on,” she said, but must also provide adequate support and training for teachers.

The Latest

A specialized Queens high school is fed up. Relocating to a new building might be the answer. But another school is also eyeing the building.

Some Chicago Head Start providers are expecting funding grants to be renewed by Dec. 1, when their grant cycle is supposed to start. But they have yet to hear about the status of funding.

A coalition of Newark students wants to work with school board members to fix problems tied to student mental health and crumbling school buildings.

Board member David Daughety requested a second legal opinion on the contract extension procedure but was told the matter is closed.

The Indianapolis Local Education Alliance is meeting Dec. 3 to start narrowing down recommendations for changing who runs schools.

The Safe Path program puts trained adults on and off school campuses to defuse fights and keep students safe in local neighborhoods.